At Louisville Beauty Academy (LBA), we often meet prospective students who are confused about how beauty school works. Many expect something similar to high school or college: fixed class schedules, mandatory lectures, and a semester system.
But Kentucky beauty schools don’t operate that way. Beauty education in this state is governed by a clock-hour system regulated by the Kentucky State Board of Cosmetology—and understanding this system is key to your success.
This article clears up common misunderstandings and explains why Louisville Beauty Academy is one of the most innovative, flexible, and supportive schools in Kentucky, using technology and one-on-one instruction to empower students to succeed at their own pace.
📚 What is a “Clock Hour” Beauty School? (According to Kentucky Law)
Under Kentucky Revised Statutes and Administrative Regulations, beauty schools must operate on a clock-hour system, not a credit-hour system. Students must complete a state-mandated number of supervised, in-person training hours to qualify for licensure.
Here are the current minimums for popular programs:
Nail Technician License – 450 hours
Esthetics License – 750 hours
Cosmetology License – 1,500 hours
Shampoo Styling License – 300 hours
Schools must track each student’s hours using an approved timekeeping method, and hours must be reported to the Kentucky State Board of Cosmetology within the first 10 days of each month for the previous month’s attendance.
✅ There are no shortcuts. You must complete all required hours. ✅ There is flexibility. You are not required to attend at fixed times.
🕰️ Do Beauty Schools Have Structured Class Times?
This is the biggest misunderstanding—and where Louisville Beauty Academy shines.
Unlike traditional schools, clock-hour beauty schools like LBA do not require fixed daily class schedules. Instead, students are free to build their own schedules within the school’s operating hours.
LBA is open Monday–Friday, 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM. Within that window, students may:
Clock in and out at their convenience
Study theory using our state-approved systems
Receive one-on-one or group instruction
Complete practical (hands-on) hours
Progress at their own pace
This means you can attend full-time, part-time, or on a flexible basis, depending on your availability and how quickly you want to finish your program.
🎓 Is There Any Instruction or Do I Study Alone?
Absolutely not—Louisville Beauty Academy (LBA) is one of the most instruction-rich beauty schools in the state, offering unmatched access to education, mentorship, and modern learning tools.
Students at LBA have access to:
✅ Licensed instructors available all day, every day, during business hours ✅ Optional structured class sessions throughout the day ✅ One-on-one instruction by request, at no extra charge ✅ Hands-on lab training and live skill demonstrations ✅ Milady CIMA by Cengage, the official Kentucky State Board-aligned digital theory system ✅ LBA’s proprietary online learning platform, updated weekly with study guides and digital prep ✅ Practice exams, test simulations, and unlimited online theory review
📘 Plus — Louisville Beauty Academy is one of the only beauty schools in the region to publish its own professionally authored series of complimentary educational books. These books go beyond standard curriculum, reinforcing student knowledge with real-world insights, exam guidance, licensing tips, and cultural context. They are available in print and digital form, and students use them alongside state-required content to excel far beyond exam requirements.
Unlike schools that rely solely on scheduled lectures or outdated textbooks, LBA uses a blended learning model that combines traditional hands-on practice with technology-assisted, AI-supported, on-demand theory education.
This multi-layered approach ensures every student—regardless of learning style, background, or schedule—has everything they need to succeed from the first day to licensure and beyond.
🤖 A Modern Approach to Beauty Education
Louisville Beauty Academy believes that education should serve the student—not the other way around. That’s why we’ve built a state-of-the-art learning model that blends:
AI-enhanced digital curriculum
Weekly-updated study materials
Real-time instructor support
Unlimited test prep
Flexible scheduling
Full transparency with no hidden costs
Students don’t have to wait for the next lecture. If they’re ready to learn, everything is available now—in class, online, and with personal support.
🧠 Who is This Ideal For?
Our model is ideal for:
Working professionals who need flexible hours
Parents and caregivers with changing schedules
Fast learners who want to complete hours quickly
Students who need more time and one-on-one support
Immigrants and non-native English speakers who benefit from custom-paced learning
Anyone serious about getting licensed without traditional debt
✅ Legally Compliant. State-Approved. Built for Student Success.
Every program offered at LBA is:
Fully licensed by the Kentucky State Board of Cosmetology
Legally structured as a clock-hour vocational training program
Transparent about tuition, attendance, and progress expectations
Compliant with all monthly reporting requirements
Our school is also a leader in student outcomes, job placement, and skill-based instruction, with hundreds of successful graduates working across Kentucky and beyond.
🚫 There’s Almost Zero Reason to Fail—Unless You Choose To
At Louisville Beauty Academy, we offer:
Daily instructor access
One-on-one guidance anytime
On-demand learning through Milady CIMA
Constant encouragement and support
A fully guided path from Day 1 to Licensure
You control your schedule. You control your pace. We walk with you every step of the way.
Unless a student chooses not to attend, not to engage, or not to participate, there is virtually no reason to fail at LBA.
Come tour the school. Ask every question. Let us show you how beauty school should work—for you.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, licensing, or educational advice. All training programs at Louisville Beauty Academy (LBA) are governed by the Kentucky State Board of Cosmetology, and all students must meet the required state licensing criteria, including the completion of approved clock hours, practical skills, and passing applicable examinations. While Louisville Beauty Academy provides comprehensive support and resources, individual success depends on the student’s attendance, effort, and commitment. The phrase “zero reason to fail” reflects the Academy’s support model but does not imply a guarantee of licensure or graduation. Policies and program structures are subject to change in accordance with state law and regulatory requirements.
At Louisville Beauty Academy (LBA), we don’t just teach beauty—we live it. In a world filled with noise and rush, we slow down to serve, to connect, and to give. And through that giving, we grow—not just as professionals, but as human beings.
LBA is now honored to serve as a pillar in the groundbreaking NABA Love Housing ecosystem, a visionary model that unites affordable housing, healthcare, food access, and dignity-filled beauty services for the elderly, disabled, and underserved. Within this powerful system, Louisville Beauty Academy plays a central role by offering 100% free beauty services—manicures, pedicures, hairstyling, facials—delivered with compassion and skill by our students.
But what makes this even more special is how our students serve.
They don’t just log clock hours for state board licensing requirements. They earn volunteer hours—real acts of love that count toward their growth and contribution to society. They don’t just observe service. They do it with us—guided side-by-side by instructors who lead with heart, not just curriculum.
And as an institution, LBA donates up to 30% of its income directly to support this ecosystem. Why? Because we believe in a future where beauty education isn’t just profitable—it’s purpose-driven, sustainable, and rooted in humanity.
This is an invitation to those who feel called to build something lasting:
To own and operate your own school, as part of this growing movement
To join a community that’s about more than skill—it’s about service
To be part of a system that prioritizes love, care, and expansion through impact
We don’t grow by chasing money. We grow by creating value through service. That’s the Louisville Beauty Academy way.
Whether you’re a student, a dreamer, or a future school owner—we welcome you. Not just to learn, but to lead through love.
This photo captures a meaningful moment for Di Tran, founder and CEO of both the New American Business Association Inc. (NABA) and Louisville Beauty Academy (LBA), and the visionary behind Di Tran University and Di Tran Enterprise.
As a presenter at the 2025 Optimal Aging Conference, hosted by the UofL Trager Institute and Republic Bank Foundation Optimal Aging Clinic, Di Tran shared the NABA Love Housing model—a fully integrated and replicable community care system designed to serve both low-income and self-funded seniors through:
🏡 NABA – lean-built, HUD-funded, and Section 8-supported affordable housing 💅 Louisville Beauty Academy – free daily beauty and wellness services by students earning both licensing and volunteer hours 💊 Kentucky Pharmacy– on-site Medicare/Medicaid-backed healthcare with AI-powered safety monitoring
The research powering this visionary approach originates from Di Tran University, where current and future studies focus on optimizing the intersection of housing, health, wellness, and human connection. It’s the think tank behind the movement—turning love and service into data-driven, sustainable models.
From a mud hut in Vietnam to the stage at the University of Louisville, Di Tran now builds systems to uplift others—combining purpose, efficiency, and deep care for the human spirit.
At Louisville Beauty Academy, we’ve seen it all—and we welcome it all.
We’ve had students who worked privately on the side for 20+ years without ever getting licensed—unknowingly doing so illegally. When they finally found us, they were still unsure, still scared. But we welcomed them, walked them through every step, and helped them finally do what they were born to do—legally, confidently, and proudly.
We’ve had parents bring their freshly graduated 18-year-old children to our doors, full of hope, only to see them run off—not because they lacked ability, but because they were scared of what they didn’t know. And that’s okay. Fear is real. But so is family. And we are family here.
We’ve had 75-year-olds walk through our doors—licensed cosmetologists and instructors from Puerto Rico, Latin America, Asia, and more—who had been in this field for over 30 years. Because their license couldn’t transfer to Kentucky, they came back to school. They sat in class beside 18-year-olds. They smiled, they studied, they passed, and they proved that it’s never too late.
We’ve had thousands of students who didn’t speak a word of English. They looked around, unsure of how they would ever finish the program. But they stayed—and they succeeded. Why?
Because at Louisville Beauty Academy, language is not a barrier. Fear is not a wall. And paperwork is not a punishment. We use translators, yes—Google Translate, written communication, text messages, verbal patience. But more than that—we use heart. Our administrators and instructors go 10 extra steps for every student. We don’t ask, “What’s your problem?” We ask, “How can we walk with you?”
We are the most affordable, the most flexible, and the most technologically advanced beauty school in Kentucky. But beyond that—we are the most human.
We say it clearly: “You have ZERO reason to fail—but yourself.”
And even then—we know how to help you win that battle too. We’ve helped so many who couldn’t overcome their own self-doubt. And we’ll be honest—if they couldn’t do it with us, they likely couldn’t do it anywhere. Because we do not give up. Not on our students. Not on people.
We do not “teach” in the old way. We guide, because teaching is no longer enough. Technology teaches faster. AI teaches smarter. But only humans can guide with heart. Only family can walk with you through life’s hesitation.
And that’s who we are.
Our founder, Di Tran, was born in a mud hut in Vietnam. He came to America with nothing. He has worked 7 days a week for over 20 years—by choice. Not out of necessity, but out of love. His life’s purpose is to elevate others, because that is where he finds his joy, and that is how he walks closer to God.
If you are scared, uncertain, or a parent unsure of what your child should do—come visit us. Just come for a tour. Come feel what it’s like to be in a place that truly cares. A place where students aren’t judged, they are embraced.
A place where:
“Yes, I can,” becomes “I Have DONE It.”
Text us at 502-625-5531 or email study@LouisvilleBeautyAcademy.net We are here. Always have been. And we will walk with you—all the way.
Disclaimer (to be placed at the top or bottom of the publication):
Disclaimer: This research report is provided by Louisville Beauty Academy (LBA) as a public educational resource to inform policymakers, educators, and beauty professionals about ongoing trends in cosmetology regulation across the United States. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, the content reflects publicly available information as of May 14, 2025. LBA does not advocate for or against specific legislation but rather seeks to elevate the quality and accessibility of beauty education through informed discussion. This document does not constitute legal advice or official regulatory guidance.
Cosmetology Board Deregulation and Reform (2020–2025)
Summary of State Deregulation Legislation (2020–2025)
State
Bill (Year)
Status
Key Provisions
Arizona
HB 2031 (2025) – Boards and Commissions; Repeal
Failed (House floor, Feb 26, 2025)
Sought to abolish the Barbering & Cosmetology Board, deregulating those professions entirely . Part of a broader “DOGE” initiative to repeal 8–10 boards as government waste.
Iowa
HF 711 (2025) – Barbering & Cosmetology Establishment Training
Enacted (Passed House 67–29; Senate 30–20 in May 2025)
Creates an “establishment training program” allowing salons/barbershops to employ unlicensed trainees for cosmetology/barber services, provided the salon registers a training program and informs clients of the trainee’s status . Simplifies school requirements and updates course of study. (Awaiting Governor’s signature as of May 2025.)
Minnesota
SF 2898 / HF 3202 (2020) – Hair/Makeup Artist Exemption
Enacted (Signed May 2020; eff. July 1, 2020)
Exempts hair styling and makeup services from licensure if practitioners complete a one-time 4-hour health and safety course . Allows unlicensed individuals to shampoo, blow-dry, and style hair (no cutting or chemicals) and apply makeup without a full cosmetology license . Enabled freelance artists to work at weddings, proms, etc., preserving an estimated 1,000 jobs .
Utah
SB 87 (2021) – Blow Dry Bar Licensure Exemption
Enacted (Signed March 2021)
Exempts “blow-dry styling” (washing, drying, styling hair with hot tools, with no cutting or chemical services) from cosmetology licensing . Unlicensed individuals must instead obtain a simplified hair safety permit after completing a brief safety course . A middle-ground approach to deregulate blow-dry bars while maintaining basic sanitation training.
Oklahoma
HB 2141 (2024) – Blow-Dry Styling Act
Enacted (Signed May 2024)
Creates a “blow-dry styling” carve-out from licensing . Individuals may shampoo, condition, dry, and style hair (including using hot tools and adding extensions) without a cosmetology license. Requires completion of instruction in general sanitation and safe use of styling devices, after which a certificate (hair safety license) is issued .
Texas
HB 1560 (2021) – TDLR Sunset Licensing Revisions
Enacted (Eff. Sept 2021)
Merged the Barbering & Cosmetology boards and license structures . Consolidated overlapping licenses (e.g. combined cosmetology and barber establishment licenses into one) . Eliminated certain licenses deemed unnecessary – e.g. barber/cosmetology instructor licenses and wig specialty licenses were repealed . Aimed to reduce duplication, streamline oversight, and lower barriers to entry in the industry .
SB 101 (2025) – Blow-Dry Licensing Repeal
Proposed (Filed Dec 2024; in committee)
Would remove the licensing requirement for blow-dry styling services in Texas . Permits anyone to wash and blow-dry hair without obtaining the 1,000-hour cosmetology license. Proponents argue blow-drying is a routine, low-risk service being over-regulated, and deregulation would cut unnecessary training costs for stylists . (Similar Texas bills in 2017 sought to cut full cosmetology hours from 1,500 to 1,000 .)
California
SB 803 (2021) – Cosmetology Reform Act
Enacted (Chapter 648, signed Oct 2021)
Comprehensive reform via sunset review. Reduced training hours for a cosmetologist license from 1,600 to 1,000 hours (barber from 1,500 to 1,000) . Eliminated the practical exam requirement (written exam only) . Created a new 600-hour hairstylist license for non-chemical hair services (shampooing, styling, cutting without chemicals) . Expanded scope for estheticians (allowed lash/brow tints), and increased board size for broader industry representation .
AB 625 (2025) – Barbering & Cosmetology
Proposed (Amended in Assembly, hearing pending)
Would remove basic hair care and styling from the licensed scope of cosmetology/barbering. Specifically, it repeals the new hairstylist license and excludes practices like arranging, cleansing, shampooing, curling, and waving hair from the definitions of cosmetology/barbering . Unlicensed individuals could perform those services in establishments if they post notice of their unlicensed status to consumers . (Aimed at deregulating salon shampooers and blow-dry specialists; maintains licensure only for chemical services and cutting.)
Eliminated the cosmetology licensing requirement for natural hair braiders . Previously, PA required braiders to complete 300 hours of cosmetology school and obtain a license ; this act exempts hair braiding from the Cosmetology Law entirely. Braiders can now practice freely (no 300-hour training), aligning PA with 30+ other states that have deregulated braiding . The law recognizes braiding as a cultural practice and removes “unnecessary barriers” to entrepreneurship .
North Carolina
SB 656 (2025) – Cosmetic Art Deregulation
Proposed (Filed Mar 2025; in committee)
Omnibus deregulation bill to exempt three specialties from licensing: natural hair care (braiding, twisting, etc.), blow-dry styling, and makeup artistry . Converts the existing mandatory Natural Hair Care license (300-hour requirement) into an optional voluntary certificate . Practitioners of the exempt services could operate without a license if they complete a one-time 4-hour sanitation course approved by the Board . The bill also expands allowed settings for practice (e.g. permitting services in homes, events, nursing homes, etc., beyond licensed salons) . (Pending as of mid-2025.)
South Carolina
H 3483 (2025) – Blow-Dry Services Exemption
Proposed (Prefiled Dec 2024; in committee)
Defines “blow-dry styling” in state law and exempts persons providing blow-dry styling services from cosmetology/barber licensure . Blow-dry styling is limited to shampooing, conditioning, drying, and styling hair (including use of extensions and wigs) without cutting or chemical treatments . The bill amends SC’s barbering and cosmetology chapters to carve out blow-dry services as an unlicensed activity, recognizing it as distinct from full cosmetology. (Pending in 2025 session.)
Ohio
HB 238 (2024) – Cosmetology and Barber Board Reforms
Enacted (Signed Jan 2025)
A broad deregulation package arising from sunset review . Expanded the 450-hour “natural hair styling” license to include haircutting in its scope (creating one of the lowest-hour pathways to cut hair in the U.S.) . Added shampooing and rinsing to the list of exempt “boutique services”, meaning salon shampoo assistants no longer need any license (just simple registration) . Removed the competitor-affidavit requirement for boutique registrants (previously braiders, threaders, makeup artists had to obtain a signed attestation from a licensed cosmetologist) – now they can work by simply registering their contact info with the Board . Overall, the law repealed “scores of regulations” to eliminate red tape while keeping basic health/safety rules .
Table: Key recent bills (2020–2025) impacting state cosmetology boards and licensing. Includes full board elimination attempts and partial deregulation measures like license exemptions for blow-dry bars, makeup artists, hair braiders, reduced training hour requirements, and board consolidations. Sources: state legislative records and industry reports .
State-by-State Developments (2020–2025)
Below we detail each state’s significant legislation regarding cosmetology board powers, licensing requirements, and deregulation efforts over the past five years:
Arizona:
Eliminating the Board – Failed Effort
Arizona saw an aggressive push to dissolve its Board of Barbers and Cosmetology in 2025. House Bill 2031, dubbed the “Arizona DOGE” bill, proposed repealing the state’s Barbering & Cosmetology Board entirely . This was part of a broader bill by Rep. Alex Kolodin (R) to eliminate eight regulatory boards deemed wasteful. HB 2031’s passage would have deregulated all barbering and cosmetology work – meaning no state license would be required to cut, color, or style hair in Arizona . Industry stakeholders sounded alarms that abolishing the board could endanger public health (due to lack of sanitation oversight) and lower professional standards . Bipartisan opposition in the legislature agreed the Cosmetology Board provides important safety oversight . In February 2025, HB 2031 failed on the House floor (42–17 vote) after several members of the sponsor’s own party joined Democrats to defeat it . Even an amendment to spare the Cosmetology Board (while still cutting other boards) was attempted, reflecting broad discomfort with fully deregulating the beauty industry . Takeaway: Arizona’s bold attempt at total cosmetology deregulation did not succeed, but it signaled a growing sentiment to scrutinize licensing boards’ necessity in the post-2024 political climate .
Arizona has also explored incremental reforms. In 2022, a separate bill (HB 2399) was introduced to reduce cosmetologist training hours from 1,500 to 1,000, and hairstylist license hours from 1,000 to 600 . That effort was in committee and aligned with national trends (similar to California’s reform) but ultimately did not cross the finish line. No major deregulation was enacted in AZ during 2020–2024, and the state’s cosmetology licensing framework remains intact as of 2025. However, the pressure to “cut red tape” in Arizona persists, evidenced by recurring bills and an executive mindset favoring smaller government oversight.
Iowa:
Salon “Training Program” and Licensing Rollbacks
Iowa moved toward partial deregulation by allowing supervised unlicensed practice. In 2025, Iowa’s legislature advanced House File 711, which creates an “establishment training program” pathway . Under HF 711, salons and barbershops can hire trainees who do not hold a license, as long as the business provides a formal in-house training program and informs clients that services are being performed by a trainee . The bill modernizes Iowa law to let cosmetology students earn practical experience on the job (with oversight) rather than exclusively in school. By mid-May 2025 HF 711 had passed both chambers with sizeable majorities, indicating broad support . (It is expected to be signed by the Governor.) This reform essentially introduces an apprenticeship-style model: it helps salons address workforce shortages and gives trainees a faster, cheaper route to learn the trade. Notably, Iowa’s move drew industry opposition – the Professional Beauty Association (PBA) warned that allowing unlicensed workers, even with disclosure, could undermine standards and consumer safety . Nonetheless, Iowa lawmakers favored the flexibility, suggesting that onerous schooling requirements can be relaxed if on-site training and transparency to customers are in place.
Iowa has also tackled other narrow deregulation issues recently. In 2022, the legislature approved SF 2119 to exempt eyebrow threading from cosmetology licensing (clarifying that threaders need not be licensed) . Another 2022 proposal, SF 2022, explicitly authorized licensed cosmetologists to make house calls and work in clients’ homes, reflecting pandemic-era shifts in service delivery . These measures – threading exemption, mobile practice, and now in 2025 the trainee program – illustrate Iowa’s step-by-step approach to easing cosmetology regulations without completely abolishing its Board. The Iowa Board of Cosmetology Arts & Sciences remains in place, but its role may shift as more alternative pathways (apprenticeships, specialty exemptions) are written into law.
Minnesota took a significant deregulation step in 2020 by carving out certain beauty services from licensing requirements. Recognizing that many people perform limited services like styling hair and doing makeup for events, lawmakers passed SF 2898/HF 3202. Effective July 1, 2020, a person who ONLY performs hairstyling and makeup application (no haircuts or chemical treatments) no longer needs a cosmetology license, provided they complete a one-time 4-hour safety course and carry proof of it . “Hairstyling” was explicitly defined as cleaning, drying, arranging, curling, and styling hair (including with extensions or wigs) without cutting or using chemicals . This reform liberated freelance makeup artists and “blow-dry bar” stylists from the burden of a 1,550-hour Minnesota cosmetology program for work that was seen as low-risk. It was celebrated by advocates and signed by Governor Tim Walz in May 2020 , immediately helping more than 1,000 workers to legally operate at weddings, proms, photoshoots, and even in clients’ homes . Other beauty treatments like facials, haircuts, or manicures still require a license, but the law marked a big change in Minnesota’s regulatory scope.
This legislative change was informed by a critical 2019–2020 audit of the Minnesota Board of Cosmetology. A report by the Legislative Auditor found that some licensing requirements were not clearly tied to health and safety. For example, at the time, Minnesota had no specialty license for simple hair services, and required full cosmetologist credentials even for just styling hair . The Legislature responded by authorizing the above exemption and even instructed the Board to develop a specialty “hairstyling” registration in the future . The audit also noted inefficiencies like overlapping salon license types and separate regulation of barbers vs. cosmetologists that “may not be the most efficient use of resources” . In short, Minnesota recognized that licensing needed right-sizing. Along with the new freelance stylist exemption, the state began considering an apprenticeship pathway and simpler licensing structure (bills in 2022 proposed a single “hair technician” license and even a total repeal of state licensing in favor of local control, though those did not pass) . The overall trend in Minnesota has been toward streamlining cosmetic services regulation – keeping critical sanitation rules, but removing needless hoops for limited-scope services.
Utah:
Blow‑Dry Bar Freedom with a “Hair Safety Permit”
Utah joined the movement to deregulate niche beauty services in 2021. Senate Bill 87 was signed into law, creating an exemption for “blow-dry bar” services. As of 2021, if a person confines their practice to washing, drying, and styling hair (with no cutting or chemical processing), Utah no longer requires a full cosmetology license . This allowed unlicensed stylists to work in blow-dry salons performing simple styling tasks. However, Utah’s law built in a safeguard: unlicensed blow-dry practitioners must obtain a “hair safety permit” . To get the permit, an individual completes a short program on hygiene, sanitation, and safe tool use – far less training than the 1,600 hours previously mandated for a cosmetology license, but still ensuring they know to disinfect brushes and handle hot irons properly . Utah’s approach was highlighted as a compromise by industry groups: not the “best case” for licensed professionals, but a reasonable middle ground that maintains public safety while reducing barriers to entry . The reform acknowledged that blow-drying is a service many consumers perform on themselves at home, and requiring extensive schooling for it imposed an unnecessary hurdle for entrepreneurs. Since SB 87’s enactment, Utah has a two-tier system: full licensure for comprehensive cosmetology, and a minimal permit for basic hair-styling only. This foreshadowed similar proposals in other states to liberate blow-dry services from heavy regulation.
Oklahoma:
Limited Deregulation for Blow‑Dry Services (2024)
Oklahoma legislators in 2024 also targeted blow-dry styling as an area for deregulation. House Bill 2141, signed into law, creates a statutory exemption for certain hair services. Under the new law, anyone can engage in shampooing, conditioning, brushing, and blow-drying hair, including the use of curling/flat irons and styling wigs or extensions, without a cosmetology license . This effectively legalizes “blow-dry bar” work by unlicensed individuals. However, similar to Utah, Oklahoma’s law isn’t a free-for-all – it mandates a basic instruction in sanitation and device use before someone can offer blow-dry services for a fee . In practice, an aspiring blow-dry stylist must complete a short course (covering how to sanitize tools, avoid scalp burns, etc.) and receive a certificate or permit from the state. Once they have that, they can work without the oversight of the Oklahoma State Board of Cosmetology for these limited services. Lawmakers crafted this as a “carve-out” within the Cosmetology Act to encourage job growth in salons focusing on blowouts and styling, while still “ensuring public safety” through minimal training . The bill was supported by those who see licensing as a barrier to quick, affordable services. By 2025, Oklahoma’s deregulation of blow-dry services was held up as a model in industry discussions – providing regulatory relief but not completely abandoning health standards .
(Oklahoma has also explored other cosmetic service exceptions. For example, a 2022 bill, HB 3195, aimed to exempt hair/MUAs working in film, TV, and theatrical productions from state cosmetology licensure . This acknowledged the unique context of entertainment industry stylists. Oklahoma’s incremental approach suggests a willingness to modernize cosmetology laws in specific areas.)
Texas:
Sunset Review Reforms and Blow‑Dry Bill
Texas undertook a major overhaul of its cosmetology and barbering regulations in 2021 through HB 1560, enacted as part of the Sunset review of the Texas Department of Licensing & Regulation (TDLR) . This law merged Texas’s Barber Board and Cosmetology Board into a single Barbering and Cosmetology program under TDLR , formally recognizing what had been two parallel licensing regimes as one. In doing so, Texas consolidated several license types: for instance, previously separate licenses for cosmetology salon vs. barbershop were unified into a single “establishment license” for any hair service business . License categories that were duplicative between barbering and cosmetology (such as certain types of hair weaving or skin care that both had) were combined . Importantly, HB 1560 also eliminated specific licenses deemed unnecessary – notably, it repealed the instructor license requirements for barber and cosmetology teachers, and abolished the specialty “wig cosmetologist” license . Lawmakers argued these additional licenses and hours did not protect the public and only made it harder for experienced professionals to advance . Supporters said the old dual-board system was inefficient, rooted more in historical gender distinctions than in modern safety needs . The 2021 reforms directed TDLR to implement changes by 2023, and by that time Texas had a single advisory board for both professions and streamlined rules. The training hour requirements in Texas remained 1,000 hours for cosmetologists, but the state clearly signaled a preference for reduced red tape and “no license for license’s sake.”
Building on that momentum, Texas in late 2024 saw the introduction of Senate Bill 101, which squarely targets the remaining licensure mandate for blow-dry styling. SB 101 (filed by Sen. Bob Hall) would explicitly remove “shampooing and blow-drying” from the cosmetology license requirements, allowing anyone to perform those services without any license . “There is nothing dangerous… it’s simply washing hair and blow drying it,” Sen. Hall argued, calling this regulation an example of costly government overreach . The bill arrived amid anecdotal reports that Texas cosmetology law still technically required a license even just to shampoo hair in a salon, something critics find absurd. (In fact, prior to 2015, Texas had a separate 150-hour “shampoo apprentice” permit – now abolished.) While SB 101 hadn’t passed as of 2025, it reflects Texas’s continuing push to lighten licensing burdens. A similar proposal in the 2017 session – to cut the full cosmetology program from 1,500 to 1,000 hours – nearly succeeded , showing legislative appetite for reform. If Texas enacts the blow-dry exemption, it would join the ranks of states carving out that niche. Meanwhile, TDLR’s existing rules already allow mobile cosmetology units and off-salon services, and exempt certain minor services (like braiding was deregulated in Texas back in the early 2010s). The trajectory in Texas is clear: fewer bureaucratic barriers in the beauty industry, balanced by TDLR’s continued oversight of core health and safety practices.
California:
Licensing Reform and New License Categories
California’s approach to cosmetology reform has been less about deregulation and more about modernization and right-sizing regulation. In 2021, California passed SB 803, a comprehensive update to the Barbering & Cosmetology Act . This law made California one of the states with the fewest required training hours for cosmetologists, cutting the mandate from 1,600 hours down to 1,000 hours for cosmetology and barbering programs . It also eliminated the state’s practical examination for licensing (formerly, students had to pass a hands-on practical test; now they need only a written exam) . The practical exam was viewed as an onerous hurdle that did not demonstrably improve consumer safety, so its removal was a win for efficiency (applicants can get licensed faster now) . To address evolving industry roles, SB 803 created a new 600-hour “hairstylist” license – a limited license covering hair services that exclude chemicals . This caters to those who only want to cut, shampoo, and style hair without learning the full cosmetology curriculum (which includes nails, skin, and chemical processes). In essence, California acknowledged that someone who just wants to be a haircut and styling specialist shouldn’t need 1,600 hours of training in unrelated topics; a shorter program would suffice . SB 803 also slightly expanded estheticians’ scope (allowing them to do lash and brow tinting/perm) and increased the size of the Board itself from 9 to 13 members to include more sector representation . These changes took effect Jan 1, 2022 and were lauded as making California a leader in licensing reform (the Governor’s signing message emphasized reducing student debt and facilitating interstate license mobility via a new endorsement process ).
By 2025, California is considering going even further for certain services. AB 625, introduced in 2025 by Assembly Member Stephanie Nguyen, proposes to deregulate simple hair care practices by removing them entirely from the Board’s jurisdiction . The bill would strike from the legal definitions of cosmetology/barbering all acts of “arranging, beautifying, cleansing, curling, dressing, shampooing, or waving” hair – effectively saying those activities do not require a license . If passed, a person could perform a shampoo and set or a basic blowout in a salon without a license, so long as they conspicuously notify customers that they are unlicensed . (Notably, cutting hair and applying chemicals/color would still be restricted to licensed professionals.) AB 625 also would repeal the 600-hour hairstylist license that California just created – the idea being that even 600 hours of schooling might be an unnecessary barrier for someone only doing non-chemical styling. Instead, those individuals would need no formal license at all. This proposal has sparked debate: supporters argue it frees up entry-level jobs (shampoo assistants, etc.) and aligns with what states like Minnesota and Utah have done, while opponents (including some cosmetology schools and the state Board) worry it rolls back consumer protections too far. As of May 2025, AB 625 had been amended and was in committee (its first hearing was postponed) . It remains to be seen if California will enact this partial deregulation. Regardless, California’s trend is to lower barriers (fewer hours, no practical test) while still maintaining one of the nation’s largest regulatory boards overseeing health and sanitation in the beauty industry.
Pennsylvania:
Freeing Natural Hair Braiders
Pennsylvania in 2024 finally addressed a long-standing concern in the African-American and natural hair care community by eliminating onerous license requirements for hair braiders. Since 2006, PA had required a “Natural Hair Braider” license (300 hours of cosmetology school and a board exam) for anyone braiding, locking, or twisting hair for pay . This was widely criticized as excessive – braiding is a traditional skill, and cosmetology programs often don’t even teach the techniques. State Senator Anthony Williams championed SB 1031 (2024) to remove these prerequisites. The bill passed the Senate 28–21 in June 2024 and by October 2024 its language was folded into Act 100, which Governor Josh Shapiro signed into law . Effective immediately, natural hair braiding is no longer part of PA’s Cosmetology Law – meaning braiders do not need any license or hours of schooling to practice . Pennsylvania thus joined the majority of states that have exempted hair braiding from cosmetology oversight (as of 2024, over 30 states had done so) .
Proponents framed this as a win for cultural tradition and entrepreneurship: braiding skills are often passed down through families and communities, and requiring braiders to spend time and money on unrelated cosmetology training was seen as a barrier that disproportionately affected women of color . Now, a person can open a braiding business in Pennsylvania without navigating the licensing bureaucracy. The new law does retain an optional avenue: braiders can still choose to get a license or certification if they want (for instance, to learn advanced sanitation or expand services), but it’s not mandatory. The Cosmetology Board lost some regulatory turf as a result – roughly 2,000 braiders statewide were previously licensed or constrained by the old system. Industry reaction in PA was generally positive among braiders and civil rights advocates, while some cosmetologists were concerned about a slippery slope (would other license types be next?). Indeed, supporters like Sen. Williams hinted this move was about “removing unnecessary barriers” broadly . The braider licensure repeal was relatively non-controversial in the legislature compared to other deregulation fights, perhaps because braiding has a clear safety record and strong cultural importance. It highlights one of the common targets of licensing reform – niche services where standard cosmetology education is seen as overkill.
North Carolina:
Broad Deregulation Bill for Hair and Makeup (2025)
In 2025, North Carolina lawmakers introduced a sweeping proposal to deregulate several corners of the beauty industry. Senate Bill 656 (“Cosmetic Art Deregulation”) is a multi-part reform that would exempt three categories of services from licensure: natural hair care, blow-dry styling, and makeup artistry . Currently, NC has separate licenses for cosmetologists, estheticians, and a Natural Hair Care Specialist license (which requires 300 hours of training) for braiding and similar services. SB 656 would make the natural hair care license voluntary – anyone could practice braiding/twisting without a license, though they could apply for a Board-issued “Certified Natural Hair Care Specialist” credential if they meet the training (essentially converting the license into a title one can earn, but not a legal prerequisite) . Likewise, performing make-up application or basic hairstyling (washing, blowing, curling, arranging hair without cuts/chemicals) would no longer require a license at all .
To address safety concerns, the bill mandates that practitioners of these now-exempt services complete a one-time 4-hour sanitation course and register with the Board – similar to Minnesota’s approach. SB 656 also updates NC law to allow these services in more environments: it expands authorized practice settings so that licensed or unlicensed practitioners can offer services in places like clients’ homes, wedding venues, photography studios, nursing homes, etc., without running afoul of the “licensed salon” requirement . This reflects a practical adaptation to consumer demand for on-site services. The bill has bipartisan sponsorship (it’s co-sponsored by both Republican and Democratic senators) , showing a coalition in favor of licensing relief. However, it has sparked debate. Schools and some licensed professionals in NC worry about competition from unlicensed individuals and potential declines in quality or accountability. The state Board of Cosmetic Art Examiners has raised questions about enforcement if a large segment of practitioners operate outside licensure. On the other hand, advocates (including some lawmakers and the Institute for Justice) argue this law will create jobs and reduce racial disparities, noting that braiding in particular has been subject to burdens that don’t match its risks .
As of spring 2025, SB 656 is still in committee, and its fate is uncertain. If enacted, North Carolina would leapfrog many states in liberalizing cosmetology laws – essentially shifting to voluntary certification for hair braiders and deregulating several cosmetic arts (with minimal training requirements). This “test case” could influence Southern states especially, as NC would be one of the first in the region to free braiders (neighboring SC and GA, for example, still license braiders to some extent). Overall, SB 656 encapsulates the broader trend: targeting specific low-risk services for deregulation, rather than tearing down the entire licensing structure.
South Carolina:
Pending Exemption for Shampoo/Blow-Dry Services
South Carolina is another state moving to trim its cosmetology regulations in line with the blow-dry bar trend. House Bill 3483, prefiled in late 2024 for the 2025 session, would exempt “blow-dry styling services” from the Board of Cosmetology’s licensing requirements . The bill carefully defines blow-dry styling as shampooing, conditioning, drying, and styling hair using mechanical devices, plus adding extensions or hairpieces, but explicitly excludes any cutting or chemical services (like coloring, relaxing, or perming) . It then amends the law so that anyone providing only blow-dry styling does not need a cosmetology or barber license . Essentially, if you’re just doing a shampoo and blowout, you wouldn’t be subject to Board regulation. The bill also tweaks the Barber Board statute to clarify that a person doing blow-dry styling without other barbering services is not under the Barber Board either .
At present, SC law requires a cosmetology license (1,500 hours of training) for even basic hair services. If H.3483 passes, it would remove a chunk of those services from licensure – a significant change. The bill is before the House Medical, Military, Public and Municipal Affairs Committee as of early 2025 . It has support from those who run blow-dry salons and believe the current licensing rules inflate costs. However, licensed cosmetologists in SC have voiced opposition, worrying that deregulation could lead to untrained individuals causing harm (burning clients with hot tools or spreading scalp conditions due to poor sanitation). The bill tries to preempt some of these arguments by noting that blow-dry styling “is distinct from the practice of cosmetology” and therefore shouldn’t be conflated with higher-risk chemical or cutting services .
This push in South Carolina aligns with simultaneous efforts in other states (NC, TX, CA, etc. in 2025) targeting the same issue. It demonstrates a regional shift in attitudes – even in states with traditionally strict licensing, legislators are asking: Does someone really need a full cosmetology license just to blow-dry hair? South Carolina appears poised to answer “no,” pending the outcome of H.3483. If adopted, the Cosmetology Board would retain authority over haircuts, chemical treatments, and other cosmetology acts, but lose jurisdiction over simple hair styling.
(South Carolina previously deregulated natural hair braiders in 2018 by removing a registration requirement, so H.3483 is part of a continuing pattern of peeling back requirements for specific services.)
Ohio:
Comprehensive Deregulation via Sunset Review
Ohio embarked on a broad-based overhaul of its cosmetology laws in 2024, using the state’s sunset review process to bundle multiple reforms into House Bill 238 . Governor Mike DeWine signed this bill in January 2025, and it brings several notable changes:
Natural Hair Styling License Reform: Ohio already had a 450-hour natural hair stylist license (for braiding and similar services). HB 238 expanded the scope of that 450-hour license to include haircutting . This means someone can become a fully qualified hair cutter with only 450 hours of training (far less than the standard cosmetology program) – making it one of the lowest-hour hair cutting credentials in the U.S. . Lawmakers intended this to increase competition and make it easier to open simple hair salons focusing on basic cuts and styles.
“Boutique Services” Expansion: Ohio uses the term “boutique services registration” for very limited tasks like braiding, threading, and makeup, which require registration but not a full license. HB 238 added shampooing and conditioning to the boutique category . Practically, this legalizes standalone shampoo assistants: a person can be hired to shampoo and rinse clients’ hair without needing to be a licensed cosmetologist (they would just register with the Board). This addressed a point of contention – many argued that requiring a license to simply shampoo hair in a salon was unnecessary.
Removal of Competitor Affidavit: Previously, Ohio’s boutique-service applicants (braiders, threaders, etc.) had to submit an affidavit signed by a licensed cosmetologist or barber attesting to their competency . Critics called this a protectionist measure – essentially forcing new entrants to get permission from existing license-holders (often competitors). HB 238 eliminated the affidavit requirement . Now, boutique service providers only need to register their contact info with the Board (so the Board knows who and where they are) and can then start working . No sign-off from established salons required.
Streamlined Apprenticeships and Credit for Inmates: Additionally, the law made it easier for individuals to get credit toward barber/cosmetology licenses through apprenticeships and prison vocational programs, as part of a workforce reentry effort . And it barred the Cosmetology Board from denying licenses due to criminal convictions older than 3 years (to reduce barriers for ex-offenders) .
The cumulative effect of HB 238 is a significant deregulatory sweep. The Institute for Justice praised it, noting that Ohio “repealed scores of regulations… far beyond what consumers needed” by leveraging an excellent sunset review process . Indeed, Ohio’s biennial budget review was used to question every cosmetology rule’s necessity. The changes sailed through with bipartisan support (the final bill had overwhelming votes, indicating consensus that these were common-sense trims). Ohio’s State Cosmetology and Barber Board remains intact, but its rules are now slimmed down. The Board must accommodate a new reality where, for example, someone with a basic “hair styling” license can cut hair with minimal hours, and whole categories of workers (braiders, threaders, makeup artists, shampooers) are simply outside the licensed regime aside from a registration. Ohio’s reforms also underscore a sunset review trend: rather than wait for lawsuits or crises, legislatures are proactively reviewing licensing boards to eliminate what they view as “red tape” .
Early feedback from the industry is mixed. Many cosmetologists in Ohio support the changes because they could reduce bottlenecks in salons (filling assistant roles more easily) and broaden the talent pipeline. Others are wary that allowing hair cutting with 450 hours might undercut professionals who underwent 1,500 hours of training. Time will tell if service quality or safety is affected – proponents point out that states with even lower hour requirements haven’t seen rampant issues, and that market forces will ensure even those with less training will seek to perfect their skills to attract clients . As of 2025, Ohio stands out for its comprehensive approach, tackling everything from braiding to criminal justice within one reform package.
National Trends and Themes (2020–2025)
Over the past five years, a clear national theme of cosmetology deregulation has emerged: state legislatures are increasingly willing to re-examine and roll back licensing requirements for the beauty industry. While no state completely abolished its cosmetology board (the lone attempt in Arizona failed ), partial deregulation measures have gained traction across red and blue states alike. Here are the key trends and the common arguments shaping this movement:
Targeted Deregulation of Low-Risk Services: A significant trend is exempting specific “niche” or low-risk beauty services from licensing. Services such as natural hair braiding, blow-dry hairstyling, shampooing, makeup application, threading, and eyelash extensions have been peeled away from cosmetology board oversight in many states. Lawmakers reason that these tasks do not involve chemicals or invasive procedures and can be learned through brief training, so requiring hundreds or thousands of school hours is unjustified . By 2025, for example, over half of states have no license requirement for braiders, and a growing handful (5–6 states) explicitly exempt blow-dry styling and simple makeup artistry . Georgia (HB 1231 in 2022) and New Hampshire (HB 1171 in 2022) introduced bills to remove blow-dry, braiding, makeup, etc. from their cosmetology definitions . California’s AB 625 and North Carolina’s SB 656 in 2025 similarly seek to carve out those activities . Even where not yet passed, this pattern shows a mindset shift: state governments are defining the scope of cosmetology more narrowly, focusing on higher-risk services (chemical treatments, cutting, etc.) and letting simple beauty services be performed with little or no regulation.
Reducing Hour Requirements for Full Licenses: Many states have moved to lower the required training hours for core cosmetology or barber licenses, addressing concerns that the U.S. had some of the longest cosmetology programs in the world. California (2021) cutting to 1,000 hours , Virginia (2022–24) moving from 1,500 to 1,000 hours (via Board regulation) , New York (2022) considering dropping its 1,000-hour requirement even lower, and states like Massachusetts (which was at 1,000) contemplating 1,000→900, are examples. In fact, by 2023 around 15 states had 1,000-hour cosmetology programs or were enacting legislation to get there . Reducing hours is seen as a way to lower tuition costs and student debt for cosmetology school, and to get professionals into the workforce faster . Proponents note that the extra 500 hours (for instance) beyond 1,000 may be spent on repetition or on services a graduate might never use in practice. Governors and legislators have explicitly linked hour reductions to economic opportunity: Virginia’s governor touted that shorter programs mean less debt and quicker earning potential for graduates . Opponents (often cosmetology schools and some salon owners) worry that shorter training could leave new licensees less prepared, or create interstate portability issues if other states still mandate more hours . However, the general momentum has been towards shorter, more focused curricula, sometimes coupled with simplified licenses (e.g., separate licenses for hair-only or nails-only with fewer hours). New Jersey and Michigan have debated similar reductions, and Ohio’s new 450-hour stylist pathway is an extreme example of how far the envelope is being pushed .
Apprenticeships and On-the-Job Training Alternatives: Deregulation efforts also promote apprenticeship models or experiential learning in lieu of formal schooling. States like West Virginia (2021) established a cosmetology apprenticeship option – allowing a portion of training hours to be earned through salon work under a mentor, rather than all in the classroom . Iowa’s 2025 HF 711 goes a step further to let salons directly train beginners and put them to work with client consent . These measures respond to criticism that cosmetology programs can be expensive and have high dropout rates (fewer than 1/3 of cosmetology students graduate on time nationally) . By integrating work experience, proponents claim students can “earn while they learn” and salons can fill staffing needs. The flip side concern is ensuring consistent training quality and preventing exploitation of trainees. Most states implementing apprenticeships require registration of the program and still mandate the trainee pass the standard board exams in the end. Nonetheless, the rigidity of the school-or-nothing model is softening. Cosmetology is aligning more with trades like plumbing or electric where multiple pathways (school or apprenticeship) exist to licensure.
Merging and Streamlining Boards: Some deregulation initiatives focus on the regulatory structure itself, not just license criteria. Merging separate boards for related professions has been one tactic. For example, Texas’s HB 1560 (2021) formally merged the Barber and Cosmetology boards (which were already under one agency) into one unified board and combined their administrative rules . Ohio (2018) had earlier merged its barber board into the cosmetology board , and other states like Georgia and Louisiana have done or considered the same. The rationale is to eliminate duplication (why have two sets of inspectors, two sets of exams, etc., for hair cutting that is very similar whether by a “barber” or “cosmetologist”). Consolidation can cut costs and reduce confusion for licensees. Another structural change is moving boards under umbrella agencies or applying “sunset reviews” to them to ensure they aren’t perpetuating unnecessary rules. Ohio’s sunset review of its Cosmetology Board in 2024 is a prime example that resulted in HB 238’s sweeping changes . Arizona’s DOGE bill was a radical version, aiming to eliminate boards deemed non-essential . While that didn’t pass, Arizona did enact a law a few years prior (2019) that allows individuals to ask the legislature for a review of any occupational regulation they feel is overly burdensome (a nod to potentially delicensing certain activities). We also see interstate compacts emerging (the Cosmetology Licensure Compact was introduced in 2023 and by 2024 Virginia and Colorado passed bills to join it ). The compact doesn’t deregulate per se, but it facilitates license mobility – a response to pressure for licensing to be less restrictive when professionals move across state lines (especially relevant for military spouses). In sum, the governance trend is toward greater efficiency and flexibility: fewer boards, broader scopes covering multiple professions, and collaboration across states to reduce redundant barriers.
Common Justifications & Criticisms: Legislators pushing these reforms often cite economic liberty and job growth. They argue that onerous cosmetology regulations shut out aspiring workers, especially those unable to afford costly schooling or who only want to perform a narrow set of services . During debates, one hears that licensing can be a “barrier to entry” or a form of unnecessary “red tape” that doesn’t correspond to real health risks . For instance, blow-dry bars are said to perform the same basic tasks people do at home, so requiring a license is seen as protectionism rather than consumer protection . Natural hair braiding is highlighted as a cultural practice that was unfairly subjected to licensing due to historical bias, with no safety justification . Lawmakers also point to inconsistencies: why do some states allow makeup artists to work unlicensed (e.g., freelance bridal makeup) while others arrest unlicensed MUAs? This patchwork has fueled a race by reformers to bring their states in line with the more permissive ones. They frequently mention, “X number of states already don’t license this, and they haven’t seen problems,” which is a compelling argument in hearings. For example, Pennsylvania noted that over 30 states had exempted braiders, and it was time PA did the same . Virginia’s regulators cited that 15+ states have 1,000-hour cosmetology, implying that 1,500 was no longer necessary .
On the other side, boards, schools, and many established professionals defend the licensing system. The Professional Beauty Association (PBA) and state beauty school associations have actively lobbied against deregulation bills. They argue that licenses ensure consistent training in sanitation, chemical handling, and infection control, which protect the public from disease or injury . PBA representatives often testify that lowering standards would be “disastrous” for consumer safety and the professionalism of the industry . They raise concerns about unlicensed operators lacking knowledge of hygiene (e.g. disinfecting tools to prevent fungal infections or lice transmission) and technical skills (e.g. a poorly trained person could burn a client’s scalp with a flat iron or cause hair loss with improper extensions ). Another argument is that deregulation can hurt small salon businesses: if unlicensed individuals undercut prices (by avoiding licensing costs), it could create unfair competition and liability issues for salons . Some licensed practitioners feel that deregulation devalues their education and license – they invested time and money to become licensed and fear their advantage erodes if the market floods with unlicensed (and potentially lower-priced) competitors . For example, when Virginia contemplated reducing hours, many cosmetology students and instructors protested, saying it might diminish their skill level or make their license less portable to other states with higher hour requirements .
Notable Stakeholder Reactions: In many states, beauty schools have been vocal opponents of hour reductions and exemptions – understandably, since fewer required hours or deregulated niches can translate to decreased enrollment. A vivid scene occurred in Virginia, where beauty school owners rallied students to speak out against the 1,000-hour proposal, worried it would strain school finances and accreditation . Conversely, free-market think tanks and legal foundations like the Institute for Justice (IJ) have been leading advocates for deregulation. IJ has backed lawsuits on behalf of braiders in several states and runs campaigns like “Beauty Not Barriers” to support bills that open up the beauty industry . They often supply expert witnesses or research (for example, IJ testimony in Ohio’s hearings emphasized that less restrictive alternatives could still protect consumers ). State executives have sometimes joined the cause: governors in states like Arizona, Ohio, and Virginia have publicly supported licensing reform as part of broader workforce development agendas. In Ohio, the governor’s signing of HB 238 was applauded as removing burdens “beyond what consumers needed” . In Arizona, Gov. Doug Ducey in prior years championed universal recognition of out-of-state licenses and was sympathetic to sunseting some licenses, setting a tone that influenced legislative efforts like the 2025 DOGE bill (though Ducey was out of office by then). On the legislative side, these issues do not always break along party lines: while many deregulation bills are sponsored by Republicans pushing smaller-government ideals, they often pick up Democrats who see the changes as helping minority communities and small businesses. North Carolina’s bipartisan SB 656 is a case in point , and the braid deregulation efforts have had broad coalition support in multiple states (from libertarians to urban Democrats).
In summary, from 2020 to 2025 the U.S. has seen a wave of occupational licensing reform focused on the cosmetology field. The momentum is generally toward pruning the scope of cosmetology boards – keeping core health and safety regulations, but eliminating requirements that are viewed as arbitrary or protectionist. Common targets are rules for services that can be safely offered with minimal training (blow-drying, braiding, etc.), and excessive education hours or red tape in obtaining licenses. Deregulation is happening incrementally rather than via wholesale abolition of boards. As we’ve seen, attempts to completely dismantle regulatory boards (e.g., Arizona) face steep opposition and have failed due to concerns about consumer harm and industry disruption . However, partial reforms are often successful when framed as reasonable updates: they have passed in conservative states like Utah and Oklahoma as well as more liberal ones like Minnesota and California. There is a clear national dialogue now between those championing “economic liberty” in beauty professions and those warning of “race to the bottom” consequences. This dialogue has even reached Congress (though federal action is unlikely, as cosmetology licensing is state-controlled). As of 2025, the deregulation momentum is still strong – dozens of bills are being introduced each year in state capitals to tweak or trim cosmetology laws. The beauty industry, its regulatory boards, and consumers are all watching closely to see how these changes impact service quality, pricing, safety, and professional livelihoods. The experiences of states leading in deregulation will likely inform the next wave of debates in those states still holding onto more stringent cosmetology regulations.
At Louisville Beauty Academy, we believe that to elevate the profession, we must first understand its foundations. In this in-depth 2025 study, we examine whether beauty services such as hair, nail, and skincare are considered “health services” under federal and Kentucky law.
Why does it matter? Because how our work is classified affects how it’s regulated, supported, and respected in society.
This research is more than legal reading—it is a call to knowledge, advocacy, and empowerment. As Kentucky’s leading beauty school and industry advocate, LBA positions itself not only as a place for training and licensure, but also as a policy-minded protector of the beauty profession.
Our goal is simple but powerful: Elevate yourself through study, elevate the industry through law. Let this document guide you—whether you’re a student, graduate, policymaker, or school owner—toward understanding your rights, your boundaries, and your future in beauty.
As we expand beyond Kentucky, our commitment stays rooted in this principle: Protect the practice, defend the profession, and educate the public. The beauty industry is not just about services; it’s about dignity, empowerment, and safety
Thanks for clarifying. I’ll look into whether beauty services like hair, nail, and skincare are legally or professionally considered part of health services—particularly in relation to physical or mental health—under both federal law and Kentucky state law. I’ll also check if there are any recent developments or classifications that reflect this connection.
I’ll update you soon with the findings.
Beauty Services vs. Health Services: Federal and Kentucky Law Perspectives
Beauty services like hair care, nail care, and skincare are generally not classified as “health services” or healthcare under U.S. federal law or Kentucky state law. Instead, they fall under cosmetology/beauty industry regulations. However, legal frameworks do recognize that personal care and appearance can impact well-being (especially mental health), and there are a few overlaps where beauty services intersect with health contexts. Below is a detailed analysis with relevant definitions, classifications, and recent developments at both the federal and state levels, followed by a summary table of key statutes and agency positions.
Federal Law Perspective
Definitions of “Health Service” or “Healthcare” (Federal)
Federal laws and regulations define “health care services” in clinical terms, focusing on medical or therapeutic care for physical and mental conditions. For example, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) regulations under HIPAA define “health care” as “care, services, or supplies related to the health of an individual,” including “preventive, diagnostic, therapeutic, rehabilitative, maintenance, or palliative care, and counseling, service, assessment, or procedure with respect to the physical or mental condition…of an individual”. This definition centers on services aimed at maintaining or improving health or treating illness (whether physical or mental). Similarly, general usage defines health care as efforts by trained professionals to maintain or restore physical, mental, or emotional well-being.
Notably, cosmetology and beauty services are not included in these healthcare definitions. Hairdressing, manicures, facials, and similar beauty treatments do not diagnose or treat medical conditions, and they do not affect the body’s structure or function in the clinical sense. In other words, beauty services are considered personal care or cosmetic services, not “health services,” under federal definitions of healthcare.
Beauty Services vs. Healthcare in Federal Law and Policy
Because beauty services are not viewed as health care, federal health statutes and programs generally exclude them. For instance, Medicare (the federal health insurance for seniors and certain disabled individuals) explicitly does not cover routine beauty or barber services. The Medicare Benefit Policy Manual lists “beauty and barber services” as non-covered items, treating them as personal comfort items rather than medically necessary care. The only exceptions are narrow cases incidental to medical care (e.g. shaving or hair trimming that might be done as part of a medical procedure), but a typical salon service is not reimbursed by Medicare or Medicaid. This reflects a clear federal stance: grooming and cosmetic services are not health services for purposes of health insurance coverage.
Federal regulations draw a distinction between medical care and personal-care assistance. For example, Medicaid’s Personal Care Services benefit covers help with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) – tasks like bathing, dressing, grooming – for individuals who need assistance to live at home. These personal-care activities, while important for hygiene and quality of life, are categorized separately from medical services. The aides providing such help are not delivering medical treatment. In fact, federal guidance notes that “unlike home health aides or nurse assistants, personal care aides do not support the delivery of health care.” In short, even when grooming and hygiene are provided as part of a care plan, they are considered supportive services, not healthcare treatments.
Mental Health and Well-Being Considerations (Federal Perspective)
Although beauty services are not healthcare, federal agencies acknowledge that personal appearance and grooming can affect mental health and overall well-being. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) and other HHS agencies emphasize holistic wellness, which can include self-care and confidence in one’s appearance as factors in mental health. For example, the Office on Women’s Health (HHS) explains that a positive body image – feeling comfortable with one’s appearance – correlates with better mental health outcomes. Women (and men) who feel good about how they look often experience improved self-esteem and emotional well-being, whereas negative body image is linked to higher risk of depression and anxiety.
This suggests that, indirectly, beauty services may contribute to mental health by improving individuals’ self-esteem, confidence, and social engagement. A relaxing haircut, manicure, or facial can relieve stress and improve mood for many people. Indeed, federal public health initiatives have leveraged beauty salons and barbershops as community touchpoints for wellness outreach. Studies have shown the feasibility of training beauty professionals as lay health educators (for example, disseminating health information in Black hair salons). And programs exist where barbershops participate in blood pressure screenings or mental health awareness, recognizing the trusted relationship between cosmetologists/barbers and clients. However, these are public health outreach strategies – they do not legally transform beauty services into “healthcare.”
In summary, under federal law cosmetology and esthetic services are not categorized as health care services. They are regulated as personal service occupations, separate from the medical industry. Federal agencies recognize the psychological and social benefits of grooming and personal care (especially for mental health and quality of life), but legally such services are not part of the healthcare delivery system. Beauticians are not healthcare providers, and their services are not governed by health care laws (aside from general public safety regulations).
Kentucky State Law Perspective
Definitions and Regulatory Framework in Kentucky
Kentucky law draws a similar line between health services and beauty services. Cosmetology, esthetics, and nail care are regulated under KRS Title XXVI (Occupations and Professions), Chapter 317A, separate from the laws governing health professions. Kentucky’s statutes and regulations do not include routine beauty services within the definition of “health services” or “health care.” In fact, recent legislation has made this delineation especially clear. In 2024, the Kentucky General Assembly passed Senate Bill 14, which updated cosmetology laws. The law “delineates the boundaries of practice for cosmetology, esthetic practices, and nail technology, ensuring that these professions are solely focused on cosmetic purposes and not on treating physical or mental ailments.” (Emphasis added). This statutory language confirms that, under Kentucky law, beauty professionals are not healthcare providers and must not purport to diagnose, treat, or address medical conditions. Their scope is limited to cosmetic improvement of hair, skin, and nails for appearance purposes.
Consistent with that framework, Kentucky’s definitions of “health care” or “health services” (found in contexts like public health or insurance law) do not list cosmetologists or salons. Health services typically refer to medical, dental, nursing, counseling, or therapeutic services provided by licensed health professionals. Cosmetologists are licensed, but under the Kentucky Board of Cosmetology rather than the Boards of Medical Licensure, Nursing, or other health boards. Thus, a hair stylist or esthetician in Kentucky is not legally recognized as a provider of health care.
Instead, beauty services are overseen by the Kentucky Board of Cosmetology, whose mission is to set educational, health, and safety standards for the beauty industry. The Board’s regulations (201 KAR Chapter 12) focus on sanitation, hygiene, and public safety in salons – for example, requiring proper disinfection of tools, cleanliness of facilities, and adherence to health/safety rules to protect clients from infections or injuries. These rules are essentially public health measures, developed in part with oversight from the Kentucky Cabinet for Health and Family Services for sanitation standards. But importantly, they do not transform salons into health clinics; they simply ensure that beauty services do not themselves become a health hazard. The Kentucky Department for Public Health does not list beauty treatments as health services, though it may collaborate in setting infection-control guidelines for salons. Enforcement remains with the cosmetology board via inspections and licensing discipline.
Licensing and Legal Status of Beauty Practitioners in KY
All individuals providing hair, nail, or skin services in Kentucky must be licensed by the Kentucky Board of Cosmetology (KRS 317A.050-.062). This licensure is an occupational license, not a health professional license. By law, cosmetologists/estheticians cannot perform acts that constitute the practice of medicine (KRS Chapter 311) or nursing (KRS 314). For example, they cannot prescribe medications, perform invasive procedures, or claim to treat skin diseases – those actions would violate medical licensing laws. SB 14 (2024) re-emphasized this by clarifying that cosmetic practice must not encroach on treating physical or mental health conditions.
Kentucky does, however, require that salons meet certain health and sanitation criteria precisely to protect clients. The Board of Cosmetology is empowered to take action to protect public health and safety – including emergency orders or referrals for prosecution if an establishment poses health risks. This means that while cosmetologists are not health care providers, their work is subject to health-related regulations (sanitation, hygiene) to prevent harm. This is analogous to how the state might regulate restaurants for health code compliance without classifying chefs as healthcare workers.
Intersections with Physical and Mental Health in Kentucky
Kentucky law contains a few “cross-over” allowances where beauty services intersect with health settings, acknowledging the supportive role these services can play:
Services for Hospice Patients: State law permits licensed cosmetologists and similar professionals to provide beauty services to patients in hospice care (and to deceased persons in funeral homes) outside of the usual salon premises. Normally, KY law requires cosmetology services to be performed in a licensed salon facility, but KRS 317A.155(3) creates an exception for terminally ill individuals under hospice care. This allowance recognizes that grooming – a haircut, shave, or nail care – can enhance the comfort and dignity of someone facing end-of-life or serious illness. While not medical treatment, these services may improve the patient’s mental well-being and quality of life. The law essentially facilitates cosmetologists contributing to patients’ emotional health (feeling cared-for and presentable) in healthcare settings, without reclassifying the services as healthcare.
Medispas and “Medical Esthetics”: As the beauty and wellness industry evolves, some businesses offer procedures that blur the line between purely cosmetic and medical. In Kentucky, so-called medical spas (medispas) provide services like Botox injections, laser hair removal, chemical peels, etc., alongside traditional spa treatments. By law, many of these advanced procedures constitute the practice of medicine or nursing, so they require licensed medical professionals to perform or supervise them. Currently, medispas in Kentucky are often jointly regulated: the establishment itself may be licensed as a salon by the Board of Cosmetology, but any medical procedures must be overseen by a physician or nurse practitioner in compliance with the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure and Board of Nursing rules. In other words, an esthetician can operate a facial machine or apply non-invasive skin treatments, but if the service goes into medical territory (e.g. injecting a dermal filler or using a prescription-grade laser), it’s legally a health service requiring a healthcare license. The state legislature has recognized this gray area – a 2022 bill (HB 340) was introduced to formally define “medical spa” and require that medispas be owned or operated by licensed health practitioners (physician, nurse) or jointly with a cosmetologist, with medical personnel on-site when medical esthetic services are provided. Although that particular bill did not pass in 2022, it reflects an ongoing regulatory effort to integrate beauty and health services safely by delineating who can do what. It reinforces that cosmetologists alone cannot perform health treatments, ensuring patient safety in these hybrid wellness settings.
Mental Health and Community Initiatives: Kentucky, like many states, has recognized the informal mental health role that barbers and cosmetologists can play in the community. While not codified in statute, there are local programs training salon professionals to spot signs of domestic abuse or mental distress in their clients and to refer them to help (some states mandate a brief training on this for license renewal). These initiatives rest on the idea that beauty service providers often develop trusting relationships with clients, who may confide in them. Kentucky’s focus has been more on public health and safety training (e.g. sanitation and now a recently added allowance for using certain tools per SB 14), but the therapeutic value of a salon visit is commonly acknowledged. Anecdotally, a trip to the salon can uplift mood and self-esteem, contributing to an individual’s mental health on a personal level. However, it is important to note that this is not a licensed mental health service – a cosmetologist is not a counselor. The benefit is a secondary effect of personal care on a person’s well-being, which Kentucky’s laws neither prohibit nor formally address, but implicitly value by allowing services in settings like hospice as noted above.
In summary, Kentucky law keeps a clear boundary: Beauty services are regulated to ensure they are safe and hygienic, but they are not categorized as health care and must remain purely cosmetic in scope. Recent updates (SB 14 in 2024) explicitly state that cosmetology and related fields do not treat physical or mental ailments. When beauty services occur in a health-related context (such as a hospital, nursing home, or medspa), Kentucky law requires compliance with any applicable medical rules and often the involvement of medical professionals for anything beyond basic cosmetic care. Beauty professionals in those settings contribute to patients’ comfort and mental well-being, but do not become healthcare providers by virtue of the setting. They remain within their cosmetic practice license.
The following table summarizes relevant statutes, regulations, and agency positions regarding whether beauty services are considered part of health services, and how they relate to physical and mental health:
Source / Law
Jurisdiction
Definition or Position
Treatment of Beauty Services
HIPAA Regs (45 CFR 160.103)
Federal
Defines “health care” as services related to an individual’s physical or mental health condition. Focus is on prevention, diagnosis, treatment of illness or impairment.
Beauty services not included – they do not address a health condition or function, so cosmetology falls outside this definition of health care.
Medicare Policy (CMS)
Federal
Medicare excludes “beauty and barber services” as not medically necessary. These personal grooming services are not covered by Medicare or Medicaid.
Confirms that hair/nail/skincare services are not recognized as health services for insurance purposes. (They are considered personal comfort or private-pay services.)
HHS Office on Women’s Health
Federal
States that positive body image and feeling good about one’s appearance are linked to better mental and physical health outcomes. Negative body image can contribute to depression or other issues.
Acknowledges mental health benefits of good appearance and self-care. Implies beauty routines can support emotional well-being, but this is a wellness perspective, not a legal reclassification of beauty services as healthcare.
KY Senate Bill 14 (2024) – now KRS 317A (various sections)
Kentucky
Updated cosmetology law to “ensure these professions are solely cosmetic and not treating physical or mental ailments.” Also expanded Board powers to protect public health.
Explicitly separates beauty services from healthcare in state law. Cosmetologists may only perform cosmetic services, not medical or mental health treatment. Confirms that beauty services are outside the health services realm legally (while emphasizing public safety).
KRS 317A.155(3) (Hospice Exception)
Kentucky
Allows licensed cosmetologists, estheticians, and nail techs to provide services to hospice patients (and to the deceased in funeral homes) outside of salon premises.
Recognizes a supportive role for beauty care in health settings. Even though not health care, such services are permitted for the comfort, dignity, and mental well-being of the ill, showing an integration of beauty into holistic care.
201 KAR 12:060 (Cosmetology Health & Safety Reg)
Kentucky
Requires salons and schools to meet strict health and safety standards to protect the public (sanitation, disinfection, etc.). Regulations promulgated with approval of health authorities for cleanliness.
Treats salons as regulated environments for public health protection, but does not classify services as healthcare. (Cosmetology board inspectors enforce hygiene, ensuring beauty services don’t pose health risks such as infections.)
MedSpa Oversight (Regulatory Practice)
Kentucky
Kentucky law and boards dictate that medical esthetic procedures (e.g. Botox, laser) at medspas require a licensed physician, PA, or nurse to perform or supervise. Cosmetologists/estheticians may only do non-medical cosmetic procedures. Legislative proposals (e.g. HB 340 in 2022) sought to formalize this by defining “medical spa” and requiring medical ownership/supervision.
Demonstrates the boundary between health services and beauty services. When a service constitutes medical treatment, it falls under health care licensing. Cosmetologists can participate in spa services, but any health care acts (injections, etc.) must be done by health professionals. This preserves the legal separation: beauty practitioners are not health care providers, though they can work alongside them in integrated wellness settings with proper oversight.
Sources: The definitions and policies above are drawn from federal regulations and guidance (HHS/CMS) and Kentucky statutes and administrative regulations. Notably, HIPAA’s definition of health care, Medicare coverage rules, and Kentucky’s cosmetology laws all reinforce that beauty services are not classified as health care services. At the same time, public health literature and agency resources recognize the contribution of personal care to mental health and well-being. Kentucky’s recent legislative changes (SB 14 in 2024) codify the scope of cosmetology as purely cosmetic, not medical or therapeutic, while still enabling collaborative settings (like medspas or hospice visits) where beauty services can complement a person’s overall wellness.
Conclusion
In conclusion, under both federal law and Kentucky law, hair care, nail care, and skincare services are not considered part of “health services” or healthcare. They are regulated in separate legal domains focused on consumer protection, sanitation, and professional licensing in the beauty industry. Cosmetology and related services are not legally recognized as providing treatment for physical or mental health conditions. However, these services are acknowledged to have ancillary benefits: maintaining personal hygiene is important for physical health (preventing infection, etc.), and looking and feeling good can boost mental health and quality of life. Federal agencies like HHS recognize the link between grooming, self-esteem, and mental wellness, and Kentucky law provides avenues for beauty professionals to contribute to well-being in settings like hospice care.
Ultimately, the integration of beauty and wellness remains mostly informal or supportive – e.g. barbers and stylists as community health messengers or sources of emotional support – rather than a formal part of health care delivery. Legal classifications remain clear that beauty services serve cosmetic and personal care purposes, while health services address medical and therapeutic needs. Kentucky’s current statutes and regulations reflect this separation, even as they encourage safe collaboration (through sanitation standards and allowing certain crossover services under proper conditions) to enhance the overall wellness of individuals.
📚 References
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (n.d.). Medicare Benefit Policy Manual: Chapter 16 – General Exclusions from Coverage. Retrieved from https://www.cms.gov
Commonwealth of Kentucky. (2024). Senate Bill 14: An Act Relating to Cosmetology (2024 Regular Session). Retrieved from https://apps.legislature.ky.gov
Kentucky Board of Cosmetology. (n.d.). Sanitation Requirements and Facility Inspection Guidelines. Retrieved from https://kycosmo.boardsofkentucky.gov/
National Institutes of Health. (2020). Personal care services under Medicaid: Definitions and distinctions. Retrieved from https://www.medicaid.gov
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). (2021). Wellness Strategies and Behavioral Health. Retrieved from https://www.samhsa.gov/wellness-initiative
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2021). Defining health care and health services: Federal policy guidance. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov
On May 12, 2025, the inspiring journey of Louisville Beauty Academy (LBA) and its founder, Di Tran, was featured in Nashville Voyager’s “Daily Inspiration” series. This recognition highlights not only the personal story of resilience and purpose behind the school’s creation but also LBA’s unwavering commitment to serving the community through accessible, debt-free vocational education.
A Humble Beginning, A Powerful Vision
In the interview, Di Tran reflects on his immigrant background, arriving in the United States from Vietnam with no English and no resources, but with unshakable determination and faith. He credits his mother’s sacrifice, a relentless work ethic, and the support of countless mentors for his path forward. Through his journey, Di discovered his true calling: to serve others by creating educational systems that empower people economically, emotionally, and spiritually.
This vision gave birth to Louisville Beauty Academy, a state-licensed and state-accredited institution that now boasts over 2,000 graduates. The school offers flexible scheduling, multilingual support, and transparent pricing with a mission to eliminate debt while preparing students for licensure and real-world success.
A School That Puts People First
Unlike traditional cosmetology schools, LBA is known for its deeply human approach to education. The school does more than teach technical skills—it nurtures confidence, promotes cultural respect, and supports single parents, immigrants, career changers, and those seeking a second chance.
Di Tran explains in the article that LBA is not just about cosmetology; it’s about changing lives. “I’m not the most talented. I’m just consistent,” he says. “And somehow, by grace, I now get to give back—through education, business, and service.”
A National Spotlight That Reflects Local Impact
Being featured in Nashville Voyager is an opportunity to reflect on the broader impact Louisville Beauty Academy is making not only in Kentucky but as a potential model for the nation. While Nashville Voyager offers exposure, the school’s real spotlight comes from its students—those who now earn a living, provide for families, and serve communities because of the training they received at LBA.
The article has been shared across LBA’s digital platforms, drawing attention to the importance of vocational education that centers on equity, opportunity, and affordability. As Di Tran shared with Nashville Voyager, “We don’t need perfection, we need presence. We don’t need to be the best—we need to be consistent, caring, and available.”
As Di Tran says, “This story isn’t just mine. It belongs to every student, every teacher, every soul who decided to try.”
About LBA: Louisville Beauty Academy is Kentucky’s leading vocational beauty school committed to debt-free, student-focused education. Founded by Di Tran, the academy prepares students for licensure and lifelong success through compassion, flexibility, and purpose-driven training.
At Louisville Beauty Academy (LBA), we are not just redefining beauty education—we are rebuilding what it means to belong, to believe in yourself, and to build a future from the ground up. Our model is not just the most affordable, the most flexible, or the most accessible in Kentucky; it is a fully replicable system—designed to expand across cities, states, and the nation—with one sacred mission: to help every individual say, “YES I CAN”, achieve “I HAVE DONE IT,” and live a life of “NOW I GIVE BACK.”
A Business Model Rooted in Human Dignity and Practical Success
LBA is a Kentucky State-Licensed and State-Accredited Beauty College that operates on a cash-based, debt-free model. Our students are not burdened with student loans or locked into rigid academic timelines. Instead, they are empowered to enroll at any time, study with flexibility, and focus on a licensing path that matches their passion—nail technology, skincare, shampoo styling, and more.
We don’t believe in the traditional “jack-of-all-trades” beauty school approach. Instead, we guide our students to choose early, commit deeply, and grow intentionally. Why? Because mastery in one skill leads to career confidence, job success, and lifelong fulfillment. We don’t want our students to try everything and feel lost—we want them to feel found, focused, and fired up.
More Than a School — A Sacred Ecosystem
LBA has created a system where every classroom, every instructor, and every policy is designed to protect the student experience. We maintain a zero-tolerance policy for disruption, ensuring that every student feels safe, respected, and uplifted. This commitment to peace and professionalism allows our students—many of whom are immigrants, working mothers, or second-chance learners—to finally breathe, focus, and thrive.
Our graduates return not just with gratitude, but with a calling. They come back to demonstrate, teach, and lift others. This is the true power of our “YES I CAN” system: it leads to a culture of giving, a spirit of mentorship, and an unbreakable chain of success.
A Scalable, National Vision
This model works—and it can be scaled. We’ve proven that in Kentucky, with nearly 2,000 graduates and counting, representing over $20–$50 million in economic impact annually through employment, entrepreneurship, and service to the public.
Now, the Louisville Beauty Academy system is ready for multiple locations, for replication across states, and for investment by those who want to build thriving, skill-centered, love-driven beauty education centers that are both economically sound and morally rich.
Each new branch is a beacon of hope for the underserved and underrepresented. Each instructor is a guide, a mentor, and a soul who says, “I believe in you.” And every student who walks in afraid walks out with a license, a career, and a new identity: confident, capable, and compassionate.
The Heart of LBA: Safety. Skill. Spirit.
At our core, Louisville Beauty Academy is this:
The most trusted place to start a beauty career
The most loving environment for anyone chasing a dream
The most structured and specific path to state licensure and economic independence
The most powerful example of community uplift in vocational education
We don’t chase clout. We build people. We don’t wait for someone to say it’s possible. We say, “Yes you can,” and we show you how.
And when our graduates say “I have done it,” they mean it. Because they’ve done it with dignity, with excellence, and with the kind of support that only comes from family.
This is Louisville Beauty Academy. This is where beauty begins and never ends. This is where you rise—and lift others with you.
Research suggests the proposed policy to allow federal loans for state-licensed beauty programs aligns with the Trump administration’s focus on reducing federal control and empowering states.
Removing hour-based barriers and accreditor mandates will support workforce development in the beauty industry, a vital economic sector.
The policy benefits the Department of Education (DOE) by streamlining aid distribution and boosting local economies.
Kentucky, through institutions like Louisville Beauty Academy (LBA) and efforts by NABA, is leading in cost-effective, skill-focused education.
Why This Matters
The beauty industry is a cornerstone of the U.S. economy, contributing $308.7 billion to GDP in 2022 and supporting 4.6 million jobs (Personal Care Products Council). In Kentucky, over 2,120 cosmetologists, 160 manicurists, and 570 skincare specialists fuel local economies (Bureau of Labor Statistics). However, federal rules limit access to aid for many state-licensed programs, delaying workforce entry and increasing costs.
Proposed Solution
Allow federal loans for any state-licensed program, regardless of hours or accreditation. This empowers students and states, reduces bureaucracy, and aligns with DOE’s mission for efficient education. Kentucky’s LBA is a successful example, offering affordable, fast-track programs that lead to immediate employment.
Benefits for All
This policy reduces federal oversight, trusts state licensing, and meets workforce demands, especially in high-growth fields like skincare. It is a low-risk, high-reward model that ensures quality through state regulation.
Detailed Policy Analysis and Alignment
Overview
This analysis evaluates a policy to allow federal student loans for all state-licensed beauty programs, removing hour-based barriers and accreditor mandates. The proposal, championed by the New American Business Association Inc. (NABA), aligns with the Trump administration’s education and workforce priorities and positions DOE as a reform leader. Kentucky, via LBA and NABA, is a national model in delivering efficient, workforce-ready education.
The Beauty Industry’s Economic and Social Significance
The U.S. beauty industry contributes $308.7 billion to GDP (2022) and supports 4.6 million jobs. Global retail sales hit $446 billion in 2023, expected to reach $580 billion by 2027 (McKinsey). In Kentucky, the sector employs:
2,120 cosmetologists and hairdressers
160 manicurists
570 estheticians
Median wages range from $14.63 to $21.72/hour (Bureau of Labor Statistics). The industry is highly resilient, inclusive (79.3% women, 33% people of color), and poised for continued growth.
Barriers in Federal Financial Aid
Federal aid restrictions create the following problems:
Hour-Based Rules: Programs under 600 hours (like Kentucky’s 450-hour Nail Technology) are excluded.
Accreditor Mandates: Even state-regulated programs are disqualified if not federally accredited, despite rigorous oversight.
These restrictions:
Delay student graduation
Force unnecessary cost inflation
Prevent students from entering the workforce quickly
Proposed Policy
NABA proposes allowing federal loans for any state-licensed program, regardless of hour count or accreditor status. The core principles include:
State Licensing as the Benchmark
Empowered Student Choice
Workforce-Driven Access
Alignment with Trump Administration Priorities
The administration has taken several actions that support this policy:
DOE Dismantling: Executive order (March 20, 2025) prioritizes state-led education.
Accreditor Reform: April 2025 order criticizes accreditors as barriers.
Workforce Emphasis: Republican plans support vocational training, including Pell Grants for short programs.
This policy advances all three goals.
Kentucky’s Leadership: LBA and NABA
Louisville Beauty Academy (LBA) is:
Kentucky State-Licensed and State-Accredited
Tuition 50–75% lower than federally funded schools
Debt-free with weekly or daily graduations
Transparent, flexible, and student-driven
LBA offers Nail Tech (450 hrs), Esthetics (750 hrs), Shampoo Styling (300 hrs), and Cosmetology (1,500 hrs) — all aimed at licensing, not just certificates. With support from employers, families, and internal scholarships, LBA delivers guaranteed results through a multi-stakeholder model.
Benefits for the DOE
Streamlined Administration
Lower Cost with Higher Outcome
Support for Industry-Aligned Training
The policy aligns education funding with workforce results — a major win for efficiency and public trust.
Employment and Economic Impact (KY, 2023)
Occupation
Employment
Median Wage
Annual Mean Wage
Hairdressers/Cosmetologists
2,120
$14.63
$48,700
Manicurists/Pedicurists
160
$17.01
$42,330
Skincare Specialists
570
$21.72
$55,060
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
The BLS projects a 7% growth in cosmetology nationwide through 2033 with 89,100 job openings annually.
Implementation Considerations
Loan Oversight: The Small Business Administration may assume loan administration post-DOE.
Aid Limits: Republican proposals may cap borrowing but support short-term vocational training.
Despite these uncertainties, the policy’s outcomes-focused design ensures resilience.
Conclusion
This proposal supports economic recovery, job creation, and student empowerment by removing unjust barriers to aid. Louisville Beauty Academy is a working proof of success, demonstrating how licensing-focused, state-approved education can deliver better outcomes faster and cheaper than traditional pathways. Let’s put trust — and funding — in the hands of the people who bear the cost: students and families.
Published by Louisville Beauty Academy A Kentucky State-Licensed and State-Accredited Beauty College May 2025
At Louisville Beauty Academy, we are committed to uplifting every student—regardless of their language background—by providing access, opportunity, and the most up-to-date information affecting your beauty education journey. We are excited to share a new development from the Kentucky Board of Cosmetology (KBC) and PSI, the national testing provider for beauty licensure exams.
🕰️ What Was the Old Process?
Historically, students who required testing in a language other than English had to go through a multi-step, often slow and confusing process:
Request approval by emailing the Kentucky Board of Cosmetology at kbc@ky.gov.
Wait for approval.
Then contact PSI separately to schedule the exam in the requested language—if it was available.
This manual system created delays, confusion, and additional work for students already navigating licensure exams. Many multilingual students, especially those new to English, faced added barriers to scheduling their exams.
✅ What’s New as of May 2025?
Thanks to a new collaboration between KBC and PSI, all test takers can now independently select their preferred language directly through their PSI online account—no separate emails or approvals required.
This new self-service language selection feature empowers candidates to manage their exam preferences quickly and easily.
🔍 Step-by-Step: How to Choose Your Language Now
👉 If You Have Already Scheduled an Exam:
Log in to your PSI account.
Click on the “Manage” tab.
Use the drop-down menu to select your preferred language.
Confirm the update and proceed as normal.
👉 If You Have Received Your PSI Eligibility Email (But Haven’t Scheduled Yet):
Log in to your PSI account.
Start the process to schedule your exam by selecting your exam type.
On the next screen, click the “Change Test Language” button.
Select your preferred language from the list.
Complete the scheduling process and submit payment.
🌎 Why This Matters
This is a major win for diversity, equity, and inclusion in Kentucky’s beauty education system. At Louisville Beauty Academy, where many of our students are first-generation Americans, immigrants, and English language learners, this change reflects a deeper respect for the multicultural reality of the beauty industry.
No longer do students need to wait, ask for permission, or struggle to get their testing language adjusted. You have the power to choose—and that’s exactly what education should offer.
💬 Need Help?
Louisville Beauty Academy is here for you every step of the way—from enrollment to exam day. If you have questions about navigating your PSI account, choosing a language, or preparing for the exam, we can walk you through it in-person or over the phone.
This change gives you more control, more flexibility, and a smoother path toward your Kentucky State Beauty License. At Louisville Beauty Academy, we celebrate every step toward equity and student empowerment. Thank you to the Kentucky Board of Cosmetology and PSI for listening to student needs and modernizing the process.
We’re proud to serve you. Let’s keep growing—together.
This is not just another study guide—it’s your complete roadmap to becoming a licensed Shampoo and Styling professional in Kentucky. If you’ve chosen the specialized path of shampooing and styling, you’ve already made a smart, focused career decision. This license is perfect for those who want to build a rewarding future in hair care without the burden of mastering every aspect of full cosmetology.
In a field where many general cosmetology graduates are left unemployed or doing unrelated jobs, this book supports a smarter, more practical path—specialization. Whether your dream is to work in a salon assisting cosmetologists or to open your own Dry Bar–style business, this guide gives you everything you need to confidently pass the Kentucky PSI theory exam and begin working legally and professionally.
Here’s why this book matters:
🧠 Focused Study: Covers every topic tested on the Kentucky PSI exam—nothing more, nothing less.
🧪 Practice Questions with Explanations: Reinforce your knowledge and understand the “why,” not just the “what.”
📘 Student-First Language: Written in clear, easy-to-follow English for real-world learners.
💡 Career-Centered Philosophy: Built around the Louisville Beauty Academy belief: train to succeed in life, not just pass a test.
🎓 A Smart Investment: 300 hours to licensure means you’re ready for work fast—with a license that allows you to provide real, valued services in salons across the state.
If you’re serious about success and want to take the most efficient path to earning a beauty industry license, this book will help get you there—confidently, clearly, and affordably.
You are not alone—Louisville Beauty Academy is here with you, every step of the way.
Introduction: The Smartest Path in Beauty? Why Choosing a Focused Shampoo & Styling License Over Full Cosmetology Makes Sense in 2025
There’s a popular saying: “Jack of all trades, master of none.” And in the beauty industry, especially today, those words carry weight.
With over 70% of licensed cosmetologists in Kentucky and across the United States reportedly no longer working in the field they trained for, it begs the question: Is more always better? Or is focused better? The answer lies in real-world results — and this book is built on that truth.
In today’s fast-moving world, debt-free, focused, and flexible education isn’t just ideal — it’s essential. At Louisville Beauty Academy, a Kentucky State-Licensed and State-Accredited Beauty College, we’ve seen the pattern again and again: the students who succeed long-term are the ones who choose clarity over confusion, specialty over generality, and a career path that aligns with their real-life goals.
This is why the Shampoo and Styling license, requiring just 300 training hours in Kentucky (as of 2025), may be one of the best-kept secrets in the beauty industry. It’s practical, accessible, and built for success without debt.
Why Shampoo and Styling?
Not everyone dreams of cutting and coloring hair. Not every salon professional wants to be the full-service provider juggling skincare, nails, perms, and more. Many love the feel of the shampoo bowl. Others light up when styling, finishing, and giving clients that final boost of confidence before they walk out the door.
This license is for you.
It’s designed specifically for individuals who:
Want to specialize in shampooing and styling hair
Prefer not to pursue the full 1,500-hour cosmetology license
Are interested in working alongside licensed cosmetologists in traditional salons
Want to open their own focused salon — like a Dry Bar-style blowout salon
Are passionate about customer service, consistency, and artistry in styling
Are looking for a fast-track license that gets them into the workforce with minimal delay
This is not a license for shortcuts. It’s a precision-focused license for professionals with a purpose.
And it may be the smartest decision you make in your beauty career.
Understanding the 300-Hour License
In Kentucky, the Board of Cosmetology outlines the Shampoo and Styling license as follows:
300 total training hours at a state-licensed beauty school
At least a 12th-grade education or equivalent (GED)
At least 18 years of age
Passing score on both the written (theory) and practical PSI licensing exams
Application and approval by the Kentucky Board of Cosmetology
This license allows the holder to perform shampooing, conditioning, scalp massage, blow-drying, flat-ironing, curling, and other styling services, but does not permit cutting, coloring, or chemical services.
This is perfect for salons seeking reliable styling specialists, particularly high-volume businesses, walk-in blowout chains, and spas with dedicated shampoo stations. It’s also a great path for those interested in starting small businesses, offering styling-only services or mobile hair styling.
And unlike cosmetology, which can take 9–12 months to complete (or longer for part-time students), this can be completed in a matter of months with dedicated focus — allowing for rapid job entry.
Avoiding the Cosmetology Trap
Cosmetology, while a powerful license, is often misunderstood and misused.
It’s common for students to enroll in cosmetology school without fully understanding what they’re committing to:
A 1,500-hour training requirement (which can take over a year)
A curriculum that includes nails, skincare, hair cutting, chemical services, and more — even if the student only wants to style hair
High tuition costs, often funded by federal loans (which many spend years trying to pay off)
Pressure to “do it all,” when they only enjoy doing one part of the work
And the result? Burnout. Student loan debt. Dropping out. Or graduating only to do something else entirely.
At Louisville Beauty Academy, we don’t want that for you.
We guide students toward the license that best fits their real goals, not what’s “popular.” If you want to cut hair, cosmetology may make sense. But if your dream is shampooing, styling, and making people feel beautiful through your hands and your heart, this license gives you everything you need.
Specialization = Sustainability
In any profession, specialization leads to strength. In beauty, it leads to long-term client loyalty, job opportunities, and business ownership.
When you specialize, you become known for one thing — and that’s powerful.
A client may bounce between hairstylists, but they’ll always remember the one who gave the perfect scalp massage, the best blowout, or the person who made them feel truly seen and pampered in your chair.
This license gives you that platform. It allows you to develop excellence in styling techniques, learn the science behind healthy hair care, and build a client base that trusts you for that specific, elevated service.
The Rise of the Dry Bar & Styling Industry
The growth of specialty salons has changed the beauty industry. Dry Bars, Blowout Salons, and Style Studios are booming.
These businesses don’t cut or color — they style. Period.
And guess what?
You don’t need a cosmetology license to work there. You need the Shampoo and Styling license.
This is the license of the future — of lean, clean, profitable business. And it’s the gateway to both employment and entrepreneurship.
Real Students. Real Careers. Real Support.
Louisville Beauty Academy has helped thousands of students across Kentucky and the U.S. earn their licenses and transform their lives.
What makes us different?
We’re state-licensed and state-accredited
We focus on practical outcomes, not just graduation
We do not push federal financial aid or loans
We offer payment plans and scholarships through NABA
We treat every student like family
We care deeply about ethics, safety, and success
We believe in loving guidance, not just instruction. In spiritual and emotional readiness, not just passing a test. We clean our floors together. We pray for our clients. We prepare for excellence.
And we are with you every step of the way.
This Book: A Study Companion for Your Success
This guide is built around the actual PSI theory licensing exam topics and includes:
Detailed content by chapter
Over 250 practice questions modeled after the PSI format
Thorough explanations and rationales for every answer
Plain English — no academic fluff
Real-world scenarios and ethical decision-making advice
Louisville Beauty Academy’s unique perspective on safe, soulful, sustainable practice
It is not just a test-prep guide. It is a pathway to becoming a licensed professional who takes pride in their specialty and care in their service.
You Belong Here
Whether you’re just starting your journey, switching careers, or returning to the beauty industry after years away, this license — and this book — are for you.
You do not need to be “everything to everyone.” You do not need to do it all.
You just need to love what you do and do it well.
And when it comes to shampooing and styling — when it comes to uplifting people through service, energy, and artistry — you already have the heart. We’re here to give you the knowledge and the license.
Welcome to your next step. Welcome to your calling. Welcome to your Shampoo & Styling career.
Infection control is the cornerstone of professional safety in any personal care service. For shampoo and styling professionals, this principle becomes even more vital due to the close physical contact with clients and the shared use of tools, shampoo bowls, towels, and chairs. A safe salon is not only a clean one—it’s one where professionals understand and apply the principles of sanitation, disinfection, and sterilization to protect themselves and every client they serve.
Key Concepts Covered in This Chapter:
Sanitation, Disinfection, and Sterilization
Bloodborne Pathogens and Exposure Control
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
OSHA Regulations
Safety Data Sheets (SDS)
Safe Work Practices in a Shampoo/Styling Setting
Sanitation, Disinfection, and Sterilization: Know the Difference
Sanitation is the lowest level of decontamination and reduces the number of pathogens on surfaces. It’s what we do daily: wiping down chairs, washing towels, and cleaning shampoo bowls with soap and water.
Disinfection is a higher level of decontamination that destroys most bacteria and viruses on nonporous surfaces using EPA-registered disinfectants.
Sterilization is the highest level of decontamination, killing all forms of microbial life. This process is not typically required for shampoo and styling services but is essential for invasive procedures.
Real-World Example: After every client, the shampoo bowl and chair must be sanitized, and combs and brushes must be disinfected with a proper EPA-approved disinfectant.
Bloodborne Pathogens & Exposure Protocols
Bloodborne pathogens like HIV and Hepatitis B can be transmitted through cuts or exposure to bodily fluids. While shampooing and styling are non-invasive services, minor scalp conditions or accidental scratches can still pose a risk.
If an exposure incident occurs:
Stop the service immediately.
Put on gloves.
Clean the area with antiseptic.
Apply a bandage if needed.
Disinfect tools and work areas.
Fill out an exposure incident form.
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Shampoo and styling professionals must use PPE where necessary. This includes:
Gloves when handling chemical shampoos or when there’s a risk of contact with blood or bodily fluids.
Aprons or capes to protect both the client and the stylist.
Safety goggles when mixing any styling products that could splash.
OSHA Regulations You Should Know
OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) sets standards that protect salon workers. Key OSHA elements include:
Ensuring access to SDS for every chemical product used.
Training on handling hazardous materials.
Providing PPE to employees.
Safety Data Sheets (SDS)
SDS sheets are required for all chemical products (like shampoos, conditioners, sprays, or styling agents). They provide information about:
Product ingredients
Safe use instructions
First-aid measures
Storage requirements
Handling and disposal
Tip for exam: Always remember that SDS must be readily available to staff at all times—not locked away or at home.
Safe Work Practices in Shampoo and Styling
Wash hands before and after every client.
Use clean towels for each individual.
Never double-dip into a product jar.
Disinfect shampoo chairs, bowls, and tools after every use.
Maintain clear walkways to avoid tripping hazards.
Store sharp or hot tools safely away from water sources.
PSI-Style Questions & Answers:
Q1: What is the correct order of decontamination from lowest to highest level? A. Disinfection → Sanitation → Sterilization B. Sanitation → Disinfection → Sterilization C. Sterilization → Disinfection → Sanitation D. Sanitation → Sterilization → Disinfection Answer: B Explanation: Sanitation removes surface debris, disinfection kills most pathogens, and sterilization eliminates all microbial life.
Q2: Which of the following is required on every chemical product used in the salon? A. Label with price B. Safety Data Sheet C. Warranty Sheet D. Barcode Answer: B Explanation: The SDS provides vital safety, handling, and emergency information for all salon chemical products.
Q3: What should you do immediately after a client bleeds during a shampoo service? A. Finish the shampoo, then clean it B. Ignore it unless they complain C. Stop the service, glove up, disinfect D. Apply shampoo over the cut Answer: C Explanation: OSHA standards require immediate action for any exposure incident to protect both parties.
Q4: What is NOT considered PPE in a salon? A. Gloves B. Apron C. Earrings D. Safety goggles Answer: C Explanation: Earrings are not protective equipment—they are personal accessories.
Q5: How often should towels be washed in a professional shampoo setting? A. Once a day B. After three clients C. After each client D. Weekly Answer: C Explanation: Towels must be washed after each client to meet sanitation standards.
Q6: Who mandates the SDS requirement in salons? A. State Board of Cosmetology B. OSHA C. FDA D. EPA Answer: B Explanation: OSHA requires that all employees have access to SDS documents to ensure safe chemical handling.
Q7: When should you clean the shampoo bowl? A. Every morning B. After each client C. Every two hours D. Before the first client only Answer: B Explanation: Shampoo bowls should be sanitized between each client to prevent contamination and uphold hygiene.
A professional in shampoo and styling must understand the structure and health of both the hair and the scalp. This knowledge allows for proper client assessment, accurate product selection, and safe, effective service delivery. Whether working in a traditional salon, a blow-dry bar, or operating independently, your ability to recognize and respond to different hair and scalp types is essential to client satisfaction and long-term career success.
Key Concepts in This Chapter:
Anatomy of the hair and scalp
Hair growth cycles
Hair texture, porosity, and elasticity
Common scalp and hair conditions
Consultation and analysis techniques
Basic Anatomy of Hair
Hair is composed of a protein called keratin, and each strand grows from a structure in the dermis called a follicle. Each hair has three main layers:
Cuticle – the outermost layer, protecting the inner layers
Cortex – gives hair its strength, color, and texture
Medulla – the innermost core (may be absent in fine hair)
Hair growth is connected to the arrector pili muscle (causing goosebumps) and is nourished by the dermal papilla.
Telogen (resting phase) – hair falls out and new growth begins
Understanding these helps explain normal hair shedding vs. abnormal loss.
Hair Texture, Porosity & Elasticity
Texture: refers to the diameter of hair (fine, medium, coarse)
Porosity: how well hair absorbs moisture. Can be low (resistant), normal, or high (overly porous/damaged)
Elasticity: the ability to stretch and return without breaking—healthy hair has good elasticity
Stylist Tip: Always assess porosity before applying heat or product. Overly porous hair needs gentler handling and conditioning.
Scalp Conditions to Recognize
Dandruff (pityriasis) – flaky, dry scalp
Seborrheic dermatitis – oily, inflamed scalp
Psoriasis – scaly, red patches that may bleed
Tinea capitis – fungal infection, should not be serviced
Pediculosis capitis (lice) – must stop service and refer out
Note: Never perform services on broken skin, active infection, or when lice are present.
Client Consultation
A visual and tactile analysis of the scalp and hair before starting service includes:
Asking about recent chemical treatments
Looking for signs of irritation or sensitivity
Feeling for texture and elasticity
Asking about products used at home
Document findings and adapt your service to meet individual needs.
PSI-Style Questions & Answers:
Q1: What is the protein that hair is primarily made of? A. Collagen B. Elastin C. Keratin D. Sebum Answer: C Explanation: Keratin is the tough protein that forms the structure of hair, skin, and nails.
Q2: What is the outermost protective layer of the hair shaft? A. Cortex B. Cuticle C. Medulla D. Papilla Answer: B Explanation: The cuticle shields the inner layers of hair and affects shine and manageability.
Q3: What phase of hair growth is the longest? A. Catagen B. Telogen C. Anagen D. Resting Answer: C Explanation: The anagen phase is the active growth phase, lasting several years.
Q4: What term describes how much moisture the hair can absorb? A. Elasticity B. Texture C. Porosity D. Density Answer: C Explanation: Porosity determines how much moisture and product the hair can retain.
Q5: Which condition is considered contagious and must not be serviced? A. Dandruff B. Psoriasis C. Tinea capitis D. Seborrheic dermatitis Answer: C Explanation: Tinea capitis (ringworm of the scalp) is a fungal infection and is highly contagious.
Q6: What is the purpose of a pre-service scalp and hair analysis? A. To determine if the hair needs a haircut B. To choose the most expensive product C. To ensure the service is safe and appropriate D. To avoid client consultation Answer: C Explanation: Proper analysis protects both the client and stylist, ensuring the right services are performed safely.
Q7: If a client presents with lice, what is the appropriate action? A. Apply tea tree oil and continue B. Continue with a quick shampoo C. Use gloves and proceed with caution D. Refuse service and refer to a medical professional Answer: D Explanation: Pediculosis (lice) requires immediate discontinuation of service and referral to a doctor.
Shampooing is not just about cleansing—it is a vital service that sets the tone for a client’s entire salon experience. Proper shampooing and scalp massage techniques demonstrate professionalism, provide client comfort, and ensure healthy hair and scalp conditions. This chapter outlines the correct procedures, water temperature control, product selection, and massage manipulations essential to the shampoo and styling license.
Key Concepts in This Chapter:
Shampooing purpose and procedure
Types of shampoo and conditioner
Water temperature and pressure control
Scalp massage techniques
Client safety and comfort
Purpose of Shampooing
Shampooing removes oils, dirt, product buildup, and skin flakes from the scalp and hair. It prepares the hair for styling services and allows for inspection of scalp and hair conditions.
Types of Shampoo
Clarifying Shampoo – Deep cleanses to remove heavy buildup
Moisturizing Shampoo – Hydrates dry or damaged hair
Medicated Shampoo – Contains ingredients for scalp conditions like dandruff
Balancing Shampoo – Ideal for oily hair and scalp
Dry Shampoo – Powder or spray for waterless cleansing
Stylist Tip: Match shampoo type to the client’s scalp condition, not just hair texture.
Conditioners
Rinse-Out Conditioner – Light conditioning used after shampooing
Leave-In Conditioner – Provides ongoing moisture and detangling
Deep Conditioner or Masque – Penetrates for repair and strength, left on longer
Protein Conditioner – Repairs damage and adds strength
Shampoo Procedure Overview
Drape client with waterproof cape and towel
Seat client comfortably at the shampoo bowl
Wet hair using water at a comfortable temperature (around body temperature)
Apply shampoo and emulsify using fingertips (not nails!)
Massage scalp using rotating or kneading motions
Rinse thoroughly with consistent pressure
Apply conditioner (if needed), then rinse again
Towel dry and proceed with styling
Water Temperature and Pressure
Always test water on your inner wrist before applying to the client
Avoid extremes: too hot can burn, too cold is uncomfortable
Maintain gentle but consistent water pressure
Scalp Massage Movements
Effleurage – Light stroking
Petrissage – Kneading motion to stimulate scalp
Tapotement – Light tapping
Friction – Deep circular rubbing
Vibration – Rapid shaking or trembling
Contraindications: Never massage the scalp if the client has:
Inflammation
Infectious diseases
Recent surgery or injury
PSI-Style Questions & Answers:
Q1: What is the most appropriate shampoo for a client with product buildup? A. Moisturizing shampoo B. Clarifying shampoo C. Medicated shampoo D. Leave-in conditioner Answer: B Explanation: Clarifying shampoo is specifically formulated to deep clean and remove heavy residue.
Q2: What massage movement is characterized by deep circular rubbing? A. Effleurage B. Friction C. Petrissage D. Vibration Answer: B Explanation: Friction involves deep rubbing in a circular motion, often used to increase circulation.
Q3: Before applying water to a client’s hair, you should: A. Ask the client what temperature they prefer B. Test the water on your own wrist C. Use cold water only D. Spray it directly on the scalp Answer: B Explanation: Testing water on your inner wrist ensures client safety and comfort.
Q4: What is a contraindication for scalp massage? A. Dry scalp B. Straight hair C. Inflamed or infected scalp D. Oily hair Answer: C Explanation: Scalp massage should be avoided if there are signs of infection or inflammation.
Q5: What shampoo type should you use for a client with dandruff? A. Balancing shampoo B. Clarifying shampoo C. Medicated shampoo D. Dry shampoo Answer: C Explanation: Medicated shampoo contains ingredients that treat scalp conditions like dandruff.
Q6: Which shampoo is best for maintaining color-treated hair? A. Protein shampoo B. Clarifying shampoo C. Color-safe shampoo D. Deep cleansing shampoo Answer: C Explanation: Color-safe shampoos are gentle and sulfate-free to avoid stripping hair color.
Q7: What step should come immediately after applying shampoo to the client’s hair? A. Rinse immediately B. Apply conditioner C. Massage the scalp D. Towel dry Answer: C Explanation: Massaging the scalp with shampoo ensures thorough cleansing and relaxation.
Once hair is clean and conditioned, the next step is styling. Styling is where your creativity shines—but it’s also where technical mastery of tools and techniques is vital. This chapter covers the proper use of blow dryers, brushes, thermal styling tools, product application, and how to achieve desired looks safely and professionally.
Blow Dryer – Used to remove moisture and shape styles
Round Brush – Adds volume or curl while blow drying
Paddle Brush – Smooths long, straight hair
Denman Brush – Ideal for smoothing and blowouts
Thermal Curling Iron – Creates curls or waves
Flat Iron – Straightens or flips hair
Crimping Iron – Adds texture
Diffuser – Preserves curl pattern while drying
Safety Tip: Always test thermal tools on a paper towel or your hand (briefly) before applying to the client’s hair.
Blow-Drying Techniques
Towel blot excess water before applying heat
Apply heat protectant to prevent damage
Section hair (typically four quadrants) for even drying
Direct airflow from roots to ends to prevent frizz
Use nozzle attachments to concentrate airflow
Finish with cool shot to lock in style and shine
Thermal Styling Basics
Curling iron sizes determine curl tightness (smaller = tighter)
Flat irons must be clean and used with heat protection
Overuse of heat can cause breakage or split ends
Finishing Techniques
Backcombing/Teasing – Creates volume at the root
Pomades/Serums – Adds shine and control
Texturizing Sprays – Adds grit and volume
Hairspray – Holds style in place
Edge control products – Smooth baby hairs and hairline
Client Communication
Ask about desired style and lifestyle habits
Recommend heat-free options if hair is damaged
Explain product choices and educate on home care
PSI-Style Questions & Answers:
Q1: What tool is best for creating volume while blow-drying? A. Flat iron B. Paddle brush C. Round brush D. Diffuser Answer: C Explanation: A round brush lifts hair at the roots and shapes volume as it dries.
Q2: Before blow drying, what should you apply to protect hair from damage? A. Hair spray B. Leave-in conditioner C. Heat protectant D. Pomade Answer: C Explanation: Heat protectant acts as a barrier, reducing damage from thermal tools.
Q3: Why should you section hair before styling or blow-drying? A. To make the process faster B. To ensure even and controlled styling C. To prevent hair from tangling D. To dry only the ends first Answer: B Explanation: Sectioning ensures that all areas are treated evenly and safely.
Q4: What styling tool adds texture by creating a zig-zag pattern? A. Diffuser B. Crimping iron C. Curling iron D. Flat iron Answer: B Explanation: Crimping irons create defined, textured zig-zag patterns in the hair.
Q5: When using a blow dryer, which direction should you aim the airflow? A. From ends to roots B. Side to side C. From roots to ends D. Straight up Answer: C Explanation: Drying from roots to ends helps smooth the hair cuticle and reduce frizz.
Q6: What is the purpose of the cool shot on a blow dryer? A. To make the dryer more powerful B. To dry hair faster C. To lock in the finished style D. To add heat to wet hair Answer: C Explanation: Cool air helps set the style and add shine.
Q7: Which product helps reduce frizz and adds shine after styling? A. Texturizing spray B. Pomade or serum C. Mousse D. Dry shampoo Answer: B Explanation: Pomades and serums smooth the hair and give it a glossy finish.
Q8: What safety measure should be taken when using thermal styling tools? A. Leave them on during lunch B. Test the heat before use C. Use without product D. Let them touch the scalp Answer: B Explanation: Always test the tool on a towel or your hand to ensure it’s not too hot.
Q9: When should you recommend a heat-free styling method? A. Always B. When the client has oily hair C. When hair shows signs of damage D. When styling for short hair Answer: C Explanation: Heat can worsen damaged hair, so heat-free options are safer.
Before styling begins, a professional must analyze the hair and scalp. This determines what products, tools, and techniques are safe and effective for the client. Poor analysis can lead to damage or poor results—so this step is essential.
Key Concepts in This Chapter:
Hair types and textures (straight, wavy, curly, coily)
Tinea Capitis (Ringworm) – Fungal infection; scaly patches, possible hair loss
Pediculosis Capitis (Head lice) – Contagious parasite; itching and visible nits
Seborrheic Dermatitis – Severe oily dandruff with redness and odor
Important: Never provide shampoo or styling services to clients with infectious scalp disorders. Refer them to a medical professional and document the issue.
Client Consultation Tips
Ask about their scalp and hair history
Gently inspect the scalp under light
Discuss their at-home care routine
Make notes for recurring visits
PSI-Style Questions & Answers
Q1: What is hair porosity? A. The number of hair strands on the scalp B. The hair’s ability to stretch and return C. The scalp’s oil production D. The hair’s ability to absorb moisture Answer: D Explanation: Porosity tells how much moisture the hair can absorb. High porosity means damaged or open cuticle layers.
Q2: A client with itchy, flaky white or yellow scales on the scalp most likely has: A. Ringworm B. Pediculosis Capitis C. Psoriasis D. Dandruff Answer: D Explanation: Dandruff is the most common cause of flakes and itchiness and can be dry or oily in nature.
Q3: Which condition is highly contagious and must not be serviced? A. Dandruff B. Psoriasis C. Pediculosis Capitis D. Dry scalp Answer: C Explanation: Head lice (Pediculosis Capitis) is contagious, and services must be denied.
Q4: Hair elasticity measures the hair’s: A. Thickness B. Ability to absorb color C. Strength and stretch D. Texture Answer: C Explanation: Elasticity determines the hair’s flexibility and strength before breaking.
Q5: What scalp condition involves red, thickened patches with silvery-white scales? A. Tinea B. Psoriasis C. Seborrhea D. Lice Answer: B Explanation: Psoriasis is a non-contagious, chronic skin condition with silvery scales.
Q6: When should a stylist refuse to provide a shampoo or style service? A. When the client has curly hair B. When the client has a contagious condition C. When the client has dandruff D. When the hair is short Answer: B Explanation: Contagious scalp disorders (e.g., lice, ringworm) require medical attention and must not be serviced.
Q7: A client with hair that resists moisture likely has: A. High porosity B. Low elasticity C. High density D. Low porosity Answer: D Explanation: Low porosity means the cuticle is tightly packed, making it resistant to moisture and product absorption.
Q8: What is the best way to assess hair density? A. Examine the hairline B. Ask the client C. Part the hair and visually inspect the scalp D. Stretch the hair strand Answer: C Explanation: Parting the hair and examining the scalp gives a clear view of how many strands grow per square inch.
Q9: Which condition presents with circular bald patches, scaly skin, and is caused by a fungus? A. Lice B. Psoriasis C. Tinea Capitis D. Seborrheic Dermatitis Answer: C Explanation: Ringworm of the scalp (Tinea Capitis) is a fungal infection causing bald spots and flaking.
This chapter explores the chemical components in shampoos, water types, and how they impact hair and scalp health. Understanding ingredients helps stylists make safe and effective product choices tailored to each client.
Core Concepts Covered:
Types of shampoo (clarifying, moisturizing, medicated, color-safe, sulfate-free, etc.)
pH and its effect on the hair and scalp
Hard water vs. soft water
Shampoo ingredients: surfactants, conditioners, humectants, and additives
Product safety and client-specific recommendations
Understanding pH in Shampoo
Hair and scalp have a natural pH of 4.5 to 5.5
Acidic pH closes the cuticle, adds shine, and maintains strength
Alkaline pH opens the cuticle—useful for deep cleansing but may dry or damage hair
Shampoo Types
Type
Purpose
Clarifying
Removes buildup, ideal before chemical services
Moisturizing
Adds hydration, good for dry or curly hair
Medicated
Treats scalp conditions like dandruff or psoriasis
Sulfate-Free
Gentler cleansing, best for color-treated or sensitive scalp
Color-Safe
Maintains hair dye, prevents fading
Volumizing
Adds body and fullness to fine hair
Water Types and Hair Impact
Soft Water – Contains fewer minerals. Creates rich lather. Ideal for shampooing.
Hard Water – High in calcium/magnesium. Can cause buildup and dullness. Use clarifying shampoos or install filters when needed.
PSI-Style Questions & Answers
Q1: What is the natural pH of hair and scalp? A. 2.0–3.0 B. 4.5–5.5 C. 6.5–7.5 D. 9.0–10.0 Answer: B Explanation: Healthy hair and scalp exist in a slightly acidic range, which helps keep the cuticle sealed and the scalp balanced.
Q2: What type of shampoo is best for removing product buildup and mineral deposits? A. Volumizing B. Clarifying C. Moisturizing D. Color-safe Answer: B Explanation: Clarifying shampoos contain stronger surfactants designed to strip away residue and buildup.
Q3: Sulfate-free shampoos are recommended for: A. Oily hair only B. Before chemical services C. Color-treated or sensitive scalps D. Weekly deep cleanses Answer: C Explanation: Sulfate-free formulas are gentler and help retain natural oils and hair color.
Q4: What ingredient allows shampoo to lather and cleanse? A. Humectant B. Surfactant C. Emollient D. Polymer Answer: B Explanation: Surfactants reduce surface tension, allowing oil and dirt to mix with water and rinse away.
Q5: What is a drawback of using shampoo with a high pH? A. Adds moisture B. Seals the cuticle C. Causes the cuticle to open D. Enhances shine Answer: C Explanation: Alkaline shampoos open the hair cuticle, which can lead to dryness or damage if overused.
Q6: Which type of water causes shampoo to lather less and may lead to mineral buildup on the hair? A. Distilled water B. Soft water C. Purified water D. Hard water Answer: D Explanation: Hard water contains minerals that interfere with surfactants and can leave a residue on the hair.
Q7: A client with dry, frizzy hair would benefit most from what type of shampoo? A. Clarifying B. Moisturizing C. Volumizing D. Protein-enriched Answer: B Explanation: Moisturizing shampoos contain emollients and conditioning agents that hydrate and soften hair.
Q8: What is the function of a humectant in shampoo? A. Prevents color fading B. Removes buildup C. Attracts moisture from the air D. Creates lather Answer: C Explanation: Humectants draw moisture from the environment to hydrate hair and improve elasticity.
Q9: A color-treated client should avoid which type of shampoo? A. Sulfate-free B. Color-safe C. Clarifying D. Moisturizing Answer: C Explanation: Clarifying shampoos can strip color from the hair and should be avoided unless absolutely necessary.
This chapter equips you with knowledge on safe and effective use of heat tools, client protection, and the impact of heat styling on hair texture and integrity.
Core Concepts Covered:
Types of blow dryers, diffusers, concentrators
Brush types and styling results (round, paddle, vented)
Flat irons, curling irons, hot rollers
Heat settings and hair type matching
Client safety and scalp protection
Thermal protectants and damage prevention
Key Tools in Heat Styling
Tool
Function
Blow Dryer
Dries hair while allowing shaping and styling
Diffuser
Disperses air evenly, ideal for curls/waves
Concentrator Nozzle
Focuses air for precision styling
Round Brush
Adds volume, curls, or flips during blow-dry
Paddle Brush
Smooths and flattens long, straight styles
Vented Brush
Speeds drying, adds volume
Flat Iron
Straightens or flips hair using heated plates
Curling Iron
Creates curls or waves with cylindrical heat barrel
Hot Rollers
Add volume and set curls without manual manipulation
PSI-Style Questions & Answers
Q1: What tool attachment helps create volume in curly hair while reducing frizz? A. Concentrator B. Diffuser C. Flat iron D. Vented brush Answer: B Explanation: A diffuser softens airflow to maintain natural curl shape and reduce frizz during drying.
Q2: What brush is best for creating volume and curl during blow drying? A. Paddle brush B. Round brush C. Vent brush D. Teasing brush Answer: B Explanation: Round brushes work with blow dryers to lift roots and add curl or bend to hair sections.
Q3: Which styling tool is used to straighten or curl hair using heated plates? A. Curling wand B. Blow dryer C. Flat iron D. Hot rollers Answer: C Explanation: Flat irons use heated plates to alter the shape of the hair strand for straight or wavy looks.
Q4: What is the purpose of a concentrator nozzle on a blow dryer? A. Reduce temperature B. Create bouncy curls C. Direct airflow for controlled styling D. Diffuse airflow for volume Answer: C Explanation: The concentrator narrows the air stream for precise styling, especially on straight styles.
Q5: What should always be applied before using thermal tools on hair? A. Moisturizer B. Pomade C. Thermal protectant D. Conditioner Answer: C Explanation: Heat protectants form a barrier to prevent moisture loss and minimize heat damage.
Q6: Which brush type is best for straightening long, thick hair during blow-drying? A. Round brush B. Paddle brush C. Vent brush D. Teasing brush Answer: B Explanation: Paddle brushes allow control and smoothness for long hair, reducing frizz and flyaways.
Q7: What can result from setting a flat iron too high for fine hair? A. Increased curl retention B. Faster straightening C. Hair damage or breakage D. More shine Answer: C Explanation: High heat on fine or fragile hair can cause cuticle damage, breakage, or burns.
Q8: Which tool is typically used for setting curls with less heat and more longevity? A. Flat iron B. Curling wand C. Hot rollers D. Blow dryer Answer: C Explanation: Hot rollers allow hair to cool in shape, which can result in longer-lasting curls with less damage.
Q9: What brush type speeds drying and adds root lift without curl? A. Paddle brush B. Round brush C. Vent brush D. Boar bristle brush Answer: C Explanation: Vented brushes allow air to pass through quickly, lifting roots without curl manipulation.
Q10: How can you protect a client’s scalp during flat ironing? A. Increase heat and speed B. Use a paddle brush C. Use a heat-resistant comb or barrier D. Use water spray before ironing Answer: C Explanation: Placing a heat-resistant comb between the flat iron and scalp helps prevent burns.
This chapter highlights the importance of pre-service consultations, effective communication, and legal/ethical considerations in preparing for a shampoo and styling service. Proper preparation ensures safety, satisfaction, and professional integrity.
A successful shampoo and style service begins with understanding the client’s needs, scalp condition, hair texture, and any limitations or sensitivities. It builds trust, ensures safety, and helps you deliver personalized results.
Common Contraindications to Watch For:
Condition
Action
Open wounds on scalp
Do not perform service; refer to physician
Scalp infections (ringworm, lice)
Deny service; recommend medical attention
Recent chemical service
Adjust shampoo or product type to avoid irritation
Sensitive or allergic scalp
Conduct patch test or choose hypoallergenic products
PSI-Style Questions & Answers
Q1: What is the first step before performing any shampoo or styling service? A. Apply shampoo B. Conduct a client consultation C. Begin blow-drying D. Choose styling products Answer: B Explanation: The client consultation identifies preferences, concerns, and medical conditions that may affect service.
Q2: A client with an open sore on the scalp should be: A. Shampooed with medicated shampoo B. Referred to a physician C. Covered with a cap D. Styled immediately Answer: B Explanation: Performing services on broken skin or open sores violates safety protocols and can lead to infection.
Q3: What form helps document client allergies, preferences, and hair history? A. Work order B. SDS form C. Client intake form D. Style release sheet Answer: C Explanation: A client intake form is used to document important health and preference information prior to the service.
Q4: During a consultation, the professional should: A. Focus only on hair length B. Suggest the most expensive products C. Listen actively and repeat back key concerns D. Avoid discussing past hair experiences Answer: C Explanation: Active listening and clear communication ensure alignment and build client trust.
Q5: Which of the following is considered a contraindication for shampoo service? A. Oily scalp B. Thick hair C. Tinea capitis (ringworm) D. Straight hair Answer: C Explanation: Ringworm is a contagious fungal infection that requires medical attention before any hair service.
Q6: What is the purpose of draping the client properly before shampooing? A. To style the hair more easily B. To protect the client’s skin and clothing C. To dry the hair faster D. To make the client sit upright Answer: B Explanation: Draping ensures sanitation and client comfort by preventing water or chemical exposure to clothing and skin.
Q7: A client reveals an allergy to coconut-based products. The stylist should: A. Proceed with usual products B. Ignore it unless a reaction occurs C. Use alternate products without coconut derivatives D. Use shampoo only, not conditioner Answer: C Explanation: Always respect allergies and use alternatives to avoid harmful reactions.
Q8: Which of the following is a sign of a professional consultation process? A. Skipping intake forms B. Assuming the client’s needs C. Offering services without explanation D. Asking questions, analyzing hair/scalp, and confirming understanding Answer: D Explanation: A full consultation includes questioning, analysis, clear explanation, and client confirmation.
Q9: Why is it important to maintain client records over time? A. To reuse old drapes B. To avoid consultations in the future C. To track progress and ensure consistency D. To reduce appointment duration Answer: C Explanation: Documented client history ensures services align with expectations and helps monitor changes in hair/scalp health.
Q10: In a dry bar-style business, consultation helps: A. Upsell more shampoo B. Quickly choose the trendiest style C. Understand the client’s occasion, style preference, and time constraints D. Ignore individual needs and use one-fits-all approach Answer: C Explanation: Personalization is key in styling; understanding the client’s schedule and goals ensures satisfaction.
This chapter helps candidates understand various types of professional haircare products used during shampoo and styling services, including how and when to use them, potential allergic reactions, and proper handling.
Every head of hair is different, and using the right products is critical to protect hair integrity, scalp health, and client satisfaction. Understanding ingredients, functions, and product categories makes you not only a stylist, but a trusted expert.
Common Product Types and Uses
Product Type
Purpose
Clarifying Shampoo
Removes buildup and prepares hair for treatment
Moisturizing Conditioner
Restores moisture to dry or chemically-treated hair
Protein Treatment
Rebuilds damaged or brittle hair
Mousse/Foam
Adds volume and light hold
Gel
Provides strong hold and definition
Pomade/Wax
Offers texture and shine, especially for short styles
Heat Protectant
Shields hair from blow dryer or flat iron damage
PSI-Style Questions & Answers
Q1: What is the primary purpose of clarifying shampoo? A. Add shine B. Strip buildup from products and minerals C. Moisturize hair D. Add volume Answer: B Explanation: Clarifying shampoo deep cleanses hair to remove buildup that can weigh hair down or interfere with chemical services.
Q2: Which product is best for dry, chemically processed hair? A. Clarifying shampoo B. Volumizing mousse C. Deep moisturizing conditioner D. Sea salt spray Answer: C Explanation: Moisturizing conditioners restore hydration, especially after color, bleach, or relaxer treatments.
Q3: What does a heat protectant do? A. Makes the hair curl B. Acts as a dry shampoo C. Protects hair from heat damage during styling D. Adds color Answer: C Explanation: Heat protectants coat the hair to reduce damage from flat irons, curling irons, and blow dryers.
Q4: Which styling product would you use to define curls with a firm hold? A. Pomade B. Mousse C. Gel D. Dry shampoo Answer: C Explanation: Gel is often used for strong hold and definition, especially for sculpting curls or wet styles.
Q5: If a client reports itching and redness after a product is used, what should you do? A. Finish the service B. Wash out the product and stop service C. Apply more product D. Ignore the complaint Answer: B Explanation: Allergic reactions require immediate attention. Stop using the product and remove it immediately.
Q6: Where can you find safety information and ingredient hazards for products used in the salon? A. Product website B. SDS (Safety Data Sheets) C. Client intake form D. Magazine ads Answer: B Explanation: SDS sheets provide safety, first aid, and chemical composition details required for salon use.
Q7: Which of the following is NOT a styling product? A. Mousse B. Protein treatment C. Pomade D. Gel Answer: B Explanation: Protein treatments are restorative, not styling-focused.
Q8: Why should a stylist avoid applying heavy oils near the scalp before a heat service? A. It makes the client’s hair smell bad B. It adds shine C. It can cause scalp burns D. It protects the hair Answer: C Explanation: Oils near the scalp can heat up excessively and may cause burns when used with heat tools.
Q9: What should you always do before trying a new product on a client? A. Guess based on smell B. Mix it with another product C. Do a patch test or consult with the client D. Apply a large amount first Answer: C Explanation: A patch test or client consultation helps avoid allergic reactions or dissatisfaction.
Q10: What’s the correct way to apply mousse? A. Directly to the scalp B. Rub into dry hair roots only C. Dispense into the palm and distribute evenly on damp hair D. Mix with conditioner Answer: C Explanation: Mousse is most effective when applied evenly through damp hair, especially before blow-drying.
This final chapter focuses on what elevates a good service to a great one: the finishing touches and the client experience. It includes blow-dry techniques, final product application, consultations, and customer care. It also prepares you to answer PSI exam questions related to professionalism, service completion, and the salon environment.
Core Concepts Covered:
Blow-dry techniques
Final product use and placement
Client consultation and aftercare advice
Handling complaints professionally
Maintaining a professional appearance
Creating a relaxing, safe salon environment
What Finishing Means in Styling Services
The finishing phase isn’t just about aesthetics—it is when clients form their lasting impression. A clean blowout, proper use of serum or spray, and clear client communication all play a role. It’s your moment to shine.
PSI-Style Questions & Answers
Q1: What is a common finishing product used to add shine and reduce frizz? A. Clarifying shampoo B. Volumizing mousse C. Silicone-based serum D. Hair gel Answer: C Explanation: Silicone serums smooth hair and add shine, perfect for finishing polished styles.
Q2: What is the main purpose of a client consultation? A. To upsell products B. To understand client expectations and needs C. To speed up service D. To avoid asking questions during the service Answer: B Explanation: Consultations ensure the stylist understands the client’s preferences, lifestyle, and concerns before starting.
Q3: What should a stylist do if a client is dissatisfied with their style? A. Ignore them B. Tell them they are wrong C. Listen attentively and offer a correction or alternative D. Argue and stick to the original plan Answer: C Explanation: Professionalism includes handling feedback gracefully and seeking a resolution that satisfies the client.
Q4: Which blow-dry technique is best for adding volume at the roots? A. Blow-drying downward with a paddle brush B. Using a diffuser C. Lifting sections upward with a round brush D. Using only fingers Answer: C Explanation: Lifting the hair upward with a round brush while blow-drying helps create root volume.
Q5: What should you offer clients after a shampoo and style service? A. Your social media page B. Aftercare tips and product recommendations C. A discount D. Their receipt and nothing more Answer: B Explanation: Offering aftercare tips helps prolong their results and builds trust in your expertise.
Q6: Which of the following contributes most to a positive client experience? A. Loud music and fast service B. Rushed conversation C. Clean environment and clear communication D. Avoiding eye contact Answer: C Explanation: Cleanliness and respectful interaction contribute greatly to comfort, trust, and repeat visits.
Q7: What is the most appropriate attire for a professional stylist? A. Casual jeans and t-shirt B. Formal wear C. Clean, professional black scrubs or salon uniform D. Whatever is trending on TikTok Answer: C Explanation: Black scrubs or uniforms present professionalism, cleanliness, and consistency for licensing and exam readiness.
Q8: What’s the last thing a stylist should do before considering a service “complete”? A. Ask for a tip B. Walk away C. Check the client’s satisfaction and offer a mirror D. Start cleaning without comment Answer: C Explanation: Checking in and offering the client a mirror gives them a final say and shows professionalism.
Q9: Why is it important to document service details after the client leaves? A. To gossip about them B. For marketing purposes C. To maintain a service history for future visits D. To share on social media Answer: C Explanation: Documentation helps remember preferences and build better long-term service quality.
Q10: What is one way to turn a first-time client into a loyal customer? A. Offer the cheapest price B. Focus only on the hairstyle C. Provide consistent, caring service and results D. Offer trendy TikTok tips Answer: C Explanation: Loyalty is built on trust, consistency, and genuine care—not just trends or pricing.
Closing Notes
Finishing techniques and exceptional client care mark the difference between an average stylist and a sought-after one. They also reflect the values Louisville Beauty Academy upholds—professionalism, quality service, and real-world preparation.
“Mastery is not in knowing everything, but in knowing exactly where you shine. Focus, specialize, serve with love—and success will follow you like your shadow.” –
Di Tran
Founder, Di Tran Enterprise
Legal Disclaimer:
This study guide is published by Louisville Beauty Academy, a Kentucky State-Licensed and State-Accredited Beauty College, with the sole intent to educate, inform, and support students preparing for the Kentucky Shampoo & Styling Licensing Exam. While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy and relevancy of the information provided, this guide does not guarantee licensure, exam passage, or any specific outcomes.
All content is offered as a supplementary learning tool and does not replace official curriculum, state board materials, or instructor-led training. Rules, regulations, and requirements for licensure are subject to change at any time by the Kentucky Board of Cosmetology. Students are encouraged to consult the official KBC website and verified school instructors for the most up-to-date information.
Louisville Beauty Academy proudly maintains a track record of guiding students to success with integrity, personalized care, and expert instruction. This guide is a reflection of that commitment—but should be used responsibly, as part of a holistic learning journey.
