Executive Summary

The professional landscape of esthetics, medical esthetics, and advanced cosmetic procedures in the Commonwealth of Kentucky is defined by a rigorous, bifurcated, and frequently misunderstood statutory framework. As the demand for non-invasive cosmetic procedures—ranging from laser hair removal to microblading—surges, the regulatory bodies governing these practices have entrenched strict delineations between “beautification” and “medicine.” This report provides an exhaustive deep research analysis of the legal, operational, and educational ecosystems surrounding the beauty industry in Kentucky, with a specific focus on the Louisville market. It examines the interplay between the Kentucky Board of Cosmetology (KBC), the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure (KBML), and the Cabinet for Health and Family Services (CHFS), illustrating how overlapping jurisdictions create a complex compliance environment for practitioners.

Central to this analysis is the pedagogical philosophy of the Louisville Beauty Academy (LBA), which markets its curriculum as the “Gold Standard” of esthetic education. Our research indicates that this standard is derived not merely from technical instruction but from a strategic philosophy of “Over-Compliance by Design.” By rigorously adhering to the strict letter of Kentucky law—specifically the prohibitions against independent laser use and injections—LBA positions its graduates to navigate the legal minefield of the modern med-spa industry without succumbing to the liabilities of unauthorized practice.

This report details the statutory prohibition of “medical estheticians,” the absolute requirement for “immediate” physician supervision during laser procedures, the distinct regulatory regime for microblading under public health laws, and the corporate practice of medicine doctrines that restrict med-spa ownership. It serves as a definitive guide for stakeholders, educators, and practitioners seeking to understand the granular realities of operating within the strictures of Kentucky law.

Part I: The Statutory Architecture of Esthetics in Kentucky

1.1 The Legislative Foundation: KRS Chapter 317A and 317B

The legal existence of the esthetician in Kentucky is rooted in Kentucky Revised Statutes (KRS) Chapter 317A, the primary legislation governing cosmetologists, and Chapter 317B, which was established specifically to regulate estheticians via House Bill 517.¹ Unlike states with tiered licensing systems that recognize “Master Estheticians” or “Advanced Practice Estheticians,” Kentucky maintains a singular, unified licensure category.

The creation of the esthetician license was a legislative acknowledgement of the specialization of skin care separate from general cosmetology. KRS 317B.010 defines an “Esthetician” strictly as “a person who is licensed by the board to engage in esthetic practices in the Commonwealth of Kentucky”.¹ This tautological definition forces reliance on the defined “Esthetic Practices,” which are enumerated in the statute to include:

1. Facial Treatments: Giving facials, including consultation and skin analysis.
2. Makeup Artistry: Providing makeup services, including corrective and camouflage techniques.
3. General Skin Care: The application of creams, lotions, and tonics.
4. Hair Removal: Removing facial hair by tweezing or waxing.
5. Body Treatments: Beautifying or cleaning the body.
6. Pre- and Post-Operative Care: Providing esthetic skin care to pre-operative and post-operative patients, either referred by or supervised by a medical professional.¹

This final provision regarding operative care is critical. It serves as the statutory bridge allowing estheticians to work in medical settings. However, it is a bridge with a gate: the statute permits care, not treatment. It authorizes the esthetician to soothe, cleanse, and camouflage the skin of a surgical patient, but it does not grant the authority to perform the surgery or any invasive procedure associated with it. The legislature’s intent was to integrate esthetics as a supportive service to medicine, not a substitute for it.

1.2 The Myth of the “Medical Esthetician” License

One of the most pervasive misconceptions in the industry is the existence of a “Medical Esthetician” license. It is imperative to state unequivocally: The Commonwealth of Kentucky does not issue, recognize, or regulate a license titled “Medical Esthetician”.²

The term is a marketing construct, used colloquially to describe an esthetician who is employed within a medical practice—such as a dermatology clinic, plastic surgery center, or medical spa. However, the location of the practice does not alter the scope of the license. An esthetician working in a hospital has the exact same legal authority as an esthetician working in a department store salon. They are both bound by KRS 317A.130, which strictly prohibits the performance of medical procedures.¹

Louisville Beauty Academy (LBA) addresses this misconception directly in its curriculum. By refusing to market a “Medical Esthetician” program and instead focusing on “Advanced Esthetics” within the legal scope, LBA immunizes its students against the false confidence that can lead to malpractice. The academy teaches that while an esthetician can work in a medical environment, they do so as a support staff member providing cosmetic services, not as a junior medical provider.²

1.3 Educational Mandates and Curriculum Design

To obtain licensure, candidates must navigate a rigorous educational pathway overseen by the Kentucky Board of Cosmetology (KBC). The statutory minimum is 750 clock hours of instruction.² This is significantly higher than some neighboring states, reflecting Kentucky’s emphasis on comprehensive training.

The 750-Hour Breakdown:

The curriculum is statutorily mandated to cover specific domains. LBA’s implementation of this curriculum highlights the weight given to each area:

• Theory and Science (approx. 250 hours): This includes anatomy, physiology, chemistry of skin care ingredients, and bacteriology. The depth of scientific training is intended to give estheticians a foundational understanding of the skin as an organ, enabling them to recognize pathologies that require medical referral.⁷
• Kentucky Statutes and Regulations (35 hours): A dedicated module on KRS 317A and 201 KAR 12. This is a critical component of the “Gold Standard” approach, as legal literacy is the primary defense against unauthorized practice.⁷
• Clinical Practice (465 hours): Hands-on training in facials, waxing, and makeup. Importantly, this training must be performed on live models or mannequins under the supervision of licensed instructors.⁷

Administrative Regulation 201 KAR 12:082 governs the operation of schools, requiring strict attendance tracking. LBA’s use of biometric or digital timekeeping is an example of “Over-Compliance,” ensuring that every minute of the required 750 hours is documented and defensible in the event of an audit.⁸

1.4 The “Gold Standard” Pedagogy of Louisville Beauty Academy

The term “Gold Standard” is not merely a marketing slogan for LBA; it represents a specific pedagogical philosophy developed by its founder, Di Tran. This philosophy is rooted in “Over-Compliance by Design”.⁸

In an industry often characterized by “cutting corners” or operating in gray areas, LBA teaches students to adhere to the strictest interpretation of the law. For example, while some schools might gloss over the nuances of supervision requirements, LBA dedicates significant instruction time to the specific definitions of “Immediate” vs. “Direct” supervision. The rationale is that an esthetician who understands the legal limits of their license is empowered to protect themselves from employers who might pressure them to perform illegal acts (such as firing a laser without a doctor present).

Furthermore, the “Gold Standard” encompasses a humanized approach to education. LBA integrates Financial Mastery into its curriculum, teaching students about tax classifications (W-2 vs. 1099), liability insurance, and the economic realities of the salon business.⁹ This holistic preparation produces graduates who are not just skilled laborers but informed business professionals.

Part II: The “Red Line” – Scope of Practice and Prohibited Acts

The boundary between esthetics and medicine in Kentucky is defined by the Stratum Corneum Rule. Administrative Regulation 201 KAR 12:280 serves as the definitive text on scope of practice restrictions.

2.1 The Stratum Corneum Barrier

The regulation explicitly defines valid esthetic practice as procedures that affect only the stratum corneum—the outermost layer of non-viable, keratinized skin cells.

• Basic Exfoliation: Defined as the removal of only the uppermost layer of the stratum corneum.¹¹ This is the “safe harbor” for estheticians.
• The Prohibition: Any procedure that penetrates deeper—specifically into the stratum germinativum (the basal layer where new skin cells are generated) or the dermis (where blood vessels and nerves reside)—is considered invasive and constitutes the practice of medicine.¹²

This physiological boundary is the legal reason why estheticians in Kentucky cannot independently perform deep chemical peels, microneedling, or ablative laser treatments. Once the barrier of the stratum corneum is breached, the procedure ceases to be “beautification” and becomes “tissue alteration,” which is the province of the physician.

2.2 Prohibited Procedures: The Explicit List

201 KAR 12:280 Section 2 and KRS 317A.130(2) provide a definitive list of acts that are prohibited for estheticians unless strictly supervised (and in some cases, prohibited regardless of supervision).

A. Injections (Botox and Dermal Fillers):

The prohibition against injections is absolute. Estheticians are forbidden from performing Botox or collagen injections.1 These substances are prescription medications that require a medical license to order and administer.

• LBA Teaching: LBA explicitly states, “We do not teach Botox.” They clarify that while estheticians can learn about the effects of Botox to better advise clients, the act of injecting is legally impossible for them to perform. Instead, they teach “Pre- and Post-Injection Care,” such as gentle lymphatic massage or hydration therapies that complement the medical procedure.¹³

B. Microneedling:

Microneedling (also known as Collagen Induction Therapy or CIT) involves using a device with needles to puncture the skin, creating controlled micro-injuries to stimulate collagen production.

• Legal Status: Prohibited. 201 KAR 12:280 explicitly lists “microneedling procedures,” “dermal rolling,” and “cosmetic dry needling” as banned practices for estheticians.¹¹
• Reasoning: The mechanism of action for microneedling requires penetration into the viable epidermis and dermis to be effective. Therefore, it inherently violates the stratum corneum rule.
• Nanoneedling: While “nanoneedling” (using silicone tips that do not pierce the skin) is theoretically a gray area, the broad language prohibiting “microneedling procedures” suggests that the Board takes a conservative view. LBA advises against any procedure involving needle-like devices to ensure compliance.¹²

C. Cosmetic Resurfacing (Advanced Peels):

The regulation distinguishes between “Basic Exfoliation” and “Cosmetic Resurfacing.”

• Cosmetic Resurfacing: Defined as the application of exfoliating substances for aesthetic improvement, including “acid or chemical peels”.¹¹
• Supervision: These procedures require Direct Supervision by a licensed health care practitioner.¹² This means a doctor or nurse practitioner must be “within immediate distance, such as on the same floor, and available to respond”.¹¹
• Safety Buffer: A licensee is prohibited from applying exfoliating acids to skin that has been microneedled or microdermabraded within the previous 7 days, unless under direct supervision.¹² This regulation protects the public from chemical burns caused by over-treatment.

2.3 Dermaplaning: The Exception

Dermaplaning (shaving the face with a scalpel to remove vellus hair and dead skin) is a permitted exception, but it is tightly regulated.

• Basic Dermaplaning: Permitted for licensed cosmetologists and estheticians if they provide documentation of specialized training.¹⁵ This is restricted to removing the stratum corneum only.
• Advanced Dermaplaning: Procedures for advanced exfoliation are permitted only under the Direct Supervision of a licensed physician.¹⁵
• Prohibition on Blades: Generally, the use of blades, knives, and lancets is prohibited. Dermaplaning is the specific carve-out to this rule, along with the use of lancets (2mm or less) for advanced impurity extraction.¹²

Part III: The Laser Bottleneck – “Immediate Supervision”

The regulation of laser devices (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation) represents the most significant conflict between the aesthetic business model and Kentucky law. This area requires careful analysis, as it is the most common source of non-compliance in the med-spa industry.

3.1 Lasers as the Practice of Medicine

The Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure (KBML) has issued clear opinions stating that the use of lasers for surgery, hair removal, or skin rejuvenation constitutes the practice of medicine.¹⁶

• Mechanism: Lasers function by selectively destroying target tissues (chromophores) through heat (photothermolysis). Whether ablating a wart or destroying a hair follicle, the process involves “cutting or altering” human tissue.
• Statutory Ban: KRS 317A.130(2) specifically lists “laser treatments” as a prohibited act for estheticians unless supervised.¹
• Regulatory Ban: 201 KAR 12:280 Section 8(2) prohibits licensees from using any procedure where tissue is “cut or altered by laser energy”.¹²

3.2 The Definition of “Immediate Supervision”

To legally perform laser treatments, an esthetician must be under “Immediate Supervision.” The definition of this term is the crux of the issue.

• The Definition: “Immediate supervision means a licensed physician is physically present in the same room and overseeing the activities of the esthetician at all times”.¹¹
• Contrast with “Direct Supervision”: Direct supervision (used for chemical peels) only requires the doctor to be on the same floor or within immediate distance.¹¹ “Immediate supervision” requires them to be standing next to the esthetician.

3.3 The Economic Implications

The “Immediate Supervision” requirement creates a severe economic bottleneck for med-spas in Kentucky.

• Business Model Failure: The standard med-spa model relies on leveraging the doctor’s license to allow lower-cost labor (estheticians) to perform high-margin procedures (lasers). If the doctor must be physically present in the room for every minute of a 45-minute laser hair removal session, the leverage is lost. The doctor could generate more revenue seeing patients for medical issues than supervising a hair removal session.
• Non-Compliance: Because strict compliance is economically difficult, many facilities operate in violation of the law. They may have a “Medical Director” who is off-site, relying on “Direct” or “Indirect” supervision protocols that are legally insufficient for lasers in Kentucky.
• LBA’s Warning: Louisville Beauty Academy teaches its students to recognize this trap. An esthetician who performs laser treatments without a doctor in the room is practicing medicine without a license. If a client is burned or reports the facility, the esthetician faces license revocation, fines, and potential criminal charges. The “I was just doing what my boss told me” defense holds no weight with the State Board.¹⁷

3.4 Comparison with Other States

To highlight the strictness of Kentucky’s “Gold Standard,” it is useful to compare it with other jurisdictions mentioned in the research.

• Illinois/Florida: Often allow “off-site” supervision for lasers, provided the physician is available by phone.¹⁹
• Kentucky: Requires “in-room” presence.
  This comparison underscores that Kentucky prioritizes patient safety above industry growth, a stance that LBA champions in its curriculum.

Part IV: Microblading, Tattooing, and Permanent Makeup

While consumers often view microblading as a beauty service similar to brow waxing, Kentucky law classifies it distinctly as Tattooing. This creates a dual-regulatory environment that estheticians must navigate.

4.1 Legal Classification: It’s Not Cosmetology

KRS 211.760 defines “Tattooing” as “the act of producing scars on a human being or the act of inserting pigment under the surface of the skin… including the application of permanent makeup”.²⁰

• Jurisdiction: These services are regulated by the Cabinet for Health and Family Services (CHFS) and local health departments, not the Board of Cosmetology.
• Scope Conflict: KRS 317A.140 prohibits estheticians from performing tattooing (including microblading) unless they are separately registered with the health department and meet all health code requirements.¹

4.2 Louisville Metro Regulatory Requirements

For a practitioner in Louisville, the local regulator is the Louisville Metro Department of Public Health and Wellness (LMPHW). The requirements are distinct and rigorous:

1. Artist Registration:

• Must be at least 18 years old.
• Bloodborne Pathogen (BBP) Training: Must complete an OSHA-compliant BBP course annually. Accepted providers include Bloodbornepathogentraining.com and Pacific Medical Training. The course must allow for Q&A with an instructor.²¹
• Fee: $100 annually for the artist registration.²¹

2. Studio Certification:

• Microblading cannot be performed in an open salon floor. It must take place in a Certified Studio that meets specific environmental health standards.
• Facility Requirements: Non-porous floors, dedicated hand-washing sinks with hot water, adequate lighting, and distinct separation from other beauty services to prevent cross-contamination.²²
• Fee: Approximately $200 annually for the studio permit.²¹

4.3 The “Salon Within a Salon” Challenge

This regulatory split creates a logistical challenge for beauty salons. A hair salon cannot simply add a microblading station. To be compliant, the salon must essentially build a “tattoo parlor” within its walls—a separate, enclosed room that passes a Health Department inspection.

• LBA’s Guidance: LBA advises students that an Esthetician license does not cover microblading. Students interested in this field are directed to seek specific BBP training and apprenticeship opportunities that satisfy CHFS requirements, ensuring they do not jeopardize their esthetic license by performing “unlicensed tattooing”.²

Part V: Corporate Practice of Medicine (CPOM) and Business Structures

For estheticians aspiring to own their own businesses, Kentucky’s Corporate Practice of Medicine (CPOM) doctrine presents a formidable legal barrier to the “Med Spa” dream.

5.1 The CPOM Doctrine

The CPOM doctrine is a legal principle which prohibits corporations (or non-physician individuals) from practicing medicine or employing physicians to practice medicine. The rationale is that medical decisions should be driven by patient health, not corporate profit.²⁴

• Application to Med Spas: Since Botox, fillers, and lasers are considered the practice of medicine, a business that offers these services is legally a medical practice.
• Ownership Restriction: Therefore, a medical spa in Kentucky must be owned by a Physician (MD/DO) or a physician-owned professional corporation.
• The Prohibition: An esthetician (or nurse, or business investor) cannot own a medical spa directly. They cannot simply “hire a Medical Director” to oversee the clinic. In the eyes of the law, this arrangement constitutes the layperson practicing medicine without a license, and the physician aiding and abetting that practice.²⁴

5.2 The Management Services Organization (MSO) Model

The only legally viable structure for non-physician ownership is the Management Services Organization (MSO).

• The Structure: The esthetician/investor forms an MSO (an LLC). The Physician forms a Professional Corporation (PC) that is 100% physician-owned.
• The Agreement: The MSO and the PC sign a Management Services Agreement (MSA). The MSO provides the facility, equipment, branding, marketing, and administrative staff to the PC. The PC employs the medical staff and retains sole authority over all clinical decisions.²⁴
• The Flow of Funds: Patients pay the PC. The PC then pays the MSO a management fee. This fee must be carefully structured (usually flat fee, not percentage of revenue) to avoid violating anti-kickback statutes.

LBA’s “Financial Mastery” Insight:

LBA’s curriculum includes “Financial Mastery,” a module derived from Di Tran’s publications. This training likely touches on the importance of proper entity formation. By understanding the MSO model, LBA graduates are better prepared to enter business partnerships with physicians that are sustainable and compliant, rather than illegal “rent-a-doc” schemes that can lead to closure.9

5.3 The Role of the Medical Director

The “Medical Director” is not just a figurehead.

• Liability: The Medical Director is legally responsible for every medical procedure performed in the facility. If an esthetician burns a client with a laser, the Medical Director is liable for negligent supervision.
• Duties: They must establish protocols, ensure staff competency, and generally be “physically present” for laser procedures under KY law.²⁶
• Telehealth Limitations: While telehealth is expanding, KBML regulations on supervision for procedures like lasers generally require physical presence. A “Zoom Medical Director” is insufficient for meeting the “Immediate Supervision” standard of 201 KAR 12:280.²⁷

Part VI: Disciplinary Actions and Consequences

The stakes for non-compliance are high. The Kentucky Board of Cosmetology has the authority to impose significant penalties on licensees who violate scope-of-practice laws.

6.1 Unlicensed Practice

KRS 317A.020 and 201 KAR 12:190 grant the Board the power to seek injunctive relief and impose fines for unlicensed practice.

• Cease and Desist: The Board can issue immediate orders to stop illegal activities (e.g., stopping a salon from offering microneedling).¹⁸
• License Revocation: A licensee found guilty of performing medical procedures (like injections) faces the permanent revocation of their esthetic license.
• Fines: Fines can be levied against both the individual artist and the salon owner.
• Salon Closure: Recent updates indicate that salons employing unlicensed workers or allowing illegal practices face “immediate closure” as an imminent danger to public safety.²⁹

6.2 The “Student” Trap

201 KAR 12:030 Section 11 specifically penalizes students. A student caught practicing outside of school (e.g., doing lashes or facials for money in their basement) before passing their exams is declared ineligible to take the exam for one year. This “zero tolerance” policy reinforces LBA’s emphasis on patience and compliance during the training period.¹⁷

Part VII: Conclusion and Strategic Recommendations

The regulatory environment for esthetics in Kentucky is one of the most rigorous in the nation, characterized by a distinct separation between cosmetic services and medical treatments. The “Gold Standard” teaching of Louisville Beauty Academy is not merely a boast; it is a necessary survival strategy in a legal landscape where the “Immediate Supervision” rule for lasers and the absolute ban on injectables create high liability for the uninformed.

7.1 Summary of Key Constraints

Domain	Regulation	Supervision Level	Status for Esthetician
Facials/Waxing	KRS 317B	None	Allowed
Dermaplaning	201 KAR 12:280	Independent (Basic) / Direct (Adv)	Allowed with Training
Chemical Peels	201 KAR 12:280	Direct (> Stratum Corneum)	Restricted
Lasers	KRS 317A.130	Immediate (In Room)	Functionally Prohibited
Botox	KRS 317A	None	Strictly Prohibited
Microneedling	201 KAR 12:280	None	Strictly Prohibited
Microblading	KRS 211.760	None (Requires Tattoo Permit)	Requires Separate License

7.2 Recommendations for Practitioners

1. Reject the “Medical Esthetician” Title: Use “Licensed Esthetician” to avoid misleading the public and regulators.
2. Verify Supervision Levels: If asked to perform laser treatments, refuse unless a physician is physically present in the room. Document this supervision.
3. Separate Microblading: If offering permanent makeup, ensure the studio is separately certified by the Health Department and that you hold a valid Tattoo Artist registration.
4. Structure Ownership Carefully: Do not attempt to open a med-spa without a specialized healthcare attorney to structure an MSO-PC compliant model.

7.3 The LBA Advantage

Louisville Beauty Academy’s “Over-Compliance by Design” philosophy provides the most robust preparation for this environment. By focusing on what is allowed (Advanced Esthetics, Business Mastery) and being brutally honest about what is forbidden (Botox, Independent Laser Use), LBA produces graduates who are not only skilled artists but savvy risk managers. In an industry rife with regulatory gray areas, this clarity is indeed the Gold Standard.

Works cited

1. chapter 137 – Legislative Research Commission, accessed January 13, 2026, https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/acts/03RS/documents/0137.pdf
2. Understanding Aesthetic Licensing in Kentucky: Clarifying the Distinctions, accessed January 13, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/understanding-aesthetic-licensing-in-kentucky-clarifying-the-distinctions/
3. Who is an Esthetician? Exploring the Roles in Beauty and Medical Fields, accessed January 13, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/who-is-an-esthetician-exploring-the-roles-in-beauty-and-medical-fields/
4. Help! Confused about medical esthetics – Reddit, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.reddit.com/r/Esthetics/comments/hk8jd9/help_confused_about_medical_esthetics/
5. AN ACT relating to licensed professionals. 1 Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky: 2 *Section 1, accessed January 13, 2026, https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/recorddocuments/bill/25RS/sb22/bill.pdf
6. Tag: medical esthetician – Louisville Beauty Academy, accessed January 13, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/tag/medical-esthetician/
7. Louisville Beauty Academy — Aesthetic/Esthetic 750 Clock Hours …, accessed January 13, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/louisville-beauty-academy-mastering-aesthetics-with-a-comprehensive-curriculum/
8. Author: ditranllc – Louisville Beauty Academy, accessed January 13, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/author/ditran/
9. Category: Uncategorized – Louisville Beauty Academy, accessed January 13, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/category/uncategorized/
10. Tag: beauty salon compliance – Louisville Beauty Academy, accessed January 13, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/tag/beauty-salon-compliance/
11. 201 KAR 12:280. Esthetic practices restrictions. RELATES TO: KRS 317A.130 STATUTORY AUTHORITY, accessed January 13, 2026, https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/services/karmaservice/documents/2040/ToPDF?markup=false
12. Title 201 Chapter 12 Regulation 280 • Kentucky Administrative Regulations – Legislative Research Commission, accessed January 13, 2026, https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/kar/titles/201/012/280/
13. Tag: beauty industry laws Kentucky, accessed January 13, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/tag/beauty-industry-laws-kentucky/
14. Title 201 Chapter 12 Regulation 280 • Kentucky Administrative Regulations – Legislative Research Commission, accessed January 13, 2026, https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/kar/titles/201/012/280/16150/
15. Download Word (.docx), accessed January 13, 2026, https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/services/karmaservice/documents/16393/ToWord?markup=false&style=web
16. 1 BOARD OPINION RELATING TO LASER SURGERY LEGAL AUTHORITY Pursuant to KRS 311.602, the following Board opinion is issued to assi – Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure, accessed January 13, 2026, https://kbml.ky.gov/board/Documents/Board%20Opinion%20Laser%20Surgery.pdf
17. Title 201 Chapter 12 Regulation 030 • Kentucky Administrative Regulations – Legislative Research Commission, accessed January 13, 2026, https://apps.legislature.ky.gov/law/kar/titles/201/012/030/
18. 201 KAR 12:190. Complaint and disciplinary process. – Kentucky Board of Cosmetology, accessed January 13, 2026, https://kbc.ky.gov/Documents/201%20KAR%2012.190.pdf
19. Laws & Regulations of Laser Operation in the United States (does not include non-laser devices), accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.aslms.org/docs/default-source/for-professionals/resources/laser-regulations-2019.pdf?sfvrsn=9369ea3b_2
20. Kentucky Revised Statutes Title XVIII. Public Health § 211.760 – Codes – FindLaw, accessed January 13, 2026, https://codes.findlaw.com/ky/title-xviii-public-health/ky-rev-st-sect-211-760.html/
21. Tattoo and Body Art – LouisvilleKY.gov, accessed January 13, 2026, https://louisvilleky.gov/government/health-wellness/services/tattoo-and-body-art
22. Tattooing and Body Piercing Frequently Asked Questions – CHFS.ky.gov, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.chfs.ky.gov/agencies/dph/dphps/psb/Documents/tattooingandbodypiercingfrequentlyaskedquestions.pdf
23. Body Art Section – Cabinet for Health and Family Services, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.chfs.ky.gov/agencies/dph/dphps/psb/Pages/tattoopiercing.aspx
24. How Non-Physician Owners Can Legally Structure Med Spa Entities – Wellness MD Group, accessed January 13, 2026, https://wellnessmdgroup.com/non-physician-med-spa-ownership-structure/
25. Who Can Open a Med Spa – Laws by State – Nextech, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.nextech.com/blog/who-can-open-a-med-spa
26. Medical Director for Chemical Peels, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.medicaldirectorco.com/services/medical-director-for-chemical-peels/
27. KENTUCKY TELEHEALTH & TELEMEDICINE LAWS – UK College of Medicine, accessed January 13, 2026, https://medicine.uky.edu/sites/default/files/inline-files/Kentucky%20Telehealth%20%26%20Telemedicine%20Laws%20-%20May%202017-Supplement%20to%20Rob%20and%20Tims.pdf
28. Hire a Medical Director & Collaborating Physician in Kentucky, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.medicaldirectorco.com/medical-director-kentucky/
29. Important Update from the Kentucky Board of Cosmetology – April 17, 2025, accessed January 13, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/%F0%9F%93%A3-important-update-from-the-kentucky-board-of-cosmetology-april-17-2025/
30. KY SB22 – BillTrack50, accessed January 13, 2026, https://www.billtrack50.com/billdetail/1767800