This research is published for public-interest education and transparency purposes only. It does not constitute legal advice, regulatory guidance, or a guarantee of outcomes. All data reflects historical performance and publicly available benchmarks.
The American postsecondary education system is currently experiencing a period of profound regulatory correction, as the federal government shifts its focus from mere enrollment numbers to the measurable economic viability of educational programs. This transition is anchored by the Department of Education’s Gainful Employment (GE) rule, a framework that establishes rigorous accountability standards for career-oriented programs.1 While many vocational institutions have viewed these regulations with apprehension, an objective analysis of the Louisville Beauty Academy (LBA) model demonstrates that these rules do not represent a threat to institutions fundamentally aligned with student success. On the contrary, the enforcement of GE standards serves as an empirical validation of the LBA philosophy, which prioritizes debt-free completion, rapid workforce entry, and high earnings premiums. By examining the legal, economic, and operational foundations of the GE rule alongside LBA’s documented outcomes, it becomes clear that the Academy’s model is not only compliant but serves as a gold standard for transparency in higher education.
The Historical and Statutory Foundations of Gainful Employment
The concept of “gainful employment” is not a modern administrative invention but is rooted in the Higher Education Act (HEA) of 1965. The HEA mandates that for-profit institutions, as well as non-degree programs at public and private non-profit colleges, must prepare students for “gainful employment in a recognized occupation” to qualify for Title IV federal student aid.3 For decades, this requirement was largely interpreted through the lens of institutional self-reporting and accreditation, which often failed to capture the true financial health of graduates. The modern regulatory cycle, beginning in earnest during the Obama administration and refined through the 2023 final rule, represents the first systematic effort to quantify this statutory mandate through earnings data and debt ratios.4
The regulatory history is characterized by significant volatility, moving from the establishment of metrics in 2011 and 2014 to a complete rescission in 2019.2 This inconsistency created a vacuum where programs with low completion rates and high debt-to-earnings ratios continued to draw heavily on taxpayer-funded Pell Grants and federal loans.6 The 2023 Financial Value Transparency and Gainful Employment (FVT/GE) final regulations restored these accountability mechanisms with increased rigor, aiming to protect students from programs that consistently leave graduates with “unaffordable debts or low earnings”.1 For LBA, this return to accountability is welcomed, as it highlights the disparity between traditional aid-dependent models and outcomes-based education.
Chronology of Federal Gainful Employment Rulemaking
| Year | Regulatory Action | Impact on Vocational Education |
| 1965 | Higher Education Act (HEA) | Established “gainful employment” as a requirement for career programs.4 |
| 2011 | Initial GE Regulations | First attempt to set debt-to-earnings thresholds.9 |
| 2014 | Revised GE Framework | Introduced the 8% annual and 20% discretionary debt benchmarks.2 |
| 2019 | Rule Rescission | Federal oversight of vocational outcomes was effectively halted.2 |
| 2023 | Final FVT/GE Rule | Published October 10; established the Earnings Premium test and Financial Value Transparency.1 |
| 2024 | Implementation Phase | Mandatory reporting of student-level data for all covered programs.2 |
| 2025 | Enforcement Deadlines | September 30 reporting deadline for the 2024 cycle; first warnings issued to failing programs.11 |
The Mechanics of Accountability: Debt-to-Earnings and Earnings Premium Tests
The current GE framework rests on two primary metrics that determine a program’s eligibility for federal funding. The first is the Debt-to-Earnings (D/E) rate, which compares the median annual loan payments of graduates to their median annual earnings.2 To pass this test, a program must demonstrate that its graduates’ debt payments do not exceed 8% of total annual earnings or 20% of discretionary earnings.3 Discretionary earnings are calculated by subtracting 150% of the federal poverty guideline from a graduate’s total earnings.2
The second metric, the Earnings Premium (EP) test, is an innovation of the 2023 rule. It measures whether the typical graduate from a program earns at least as much as a typical high school graduate in the labor force within the same state, specifically looking at the 25–34 age demographic.2 Programs that fail to meet this basic threshold are categorized as “low-earnings”.8 The rationale behind the EP test is that postsecondary education should provide an economic lift above the baseline of a high school diploma; if it does not, the investment of time and taxpayer money is deemed unjustified.8
Standard GE Metric Benchmarks for Success
| Metric | Passing Standard | Failing Standard |
| Annual D/E Rate | ||
| Discretionary D/E Rate | ||
| Earnings Premium (EP) |
For a program to remain in good standing and maintain Title IV eligibility, it must pass at least one of the D/E metrics and the EP test.13 Failure to do so in two of any three consecutive years results in a revocation of federal aid eligibility.5 These standards are designed to act as a quality filter, ensuring that institutions are “worth the investment”.13 Louisville Beauty Academy’s model is particularly resilient under these standards because it fundamentally eliminates the “Debt” side of the D/E equation while maximizing the “Earnings” side through rapid workforce entry.
The Legal Resilience of Outcomes-Based Regulation
The path to enforcement has been marked by significant legal challenges from industry associations that argued the Department of Education exceeded its authority.5 However, the 2025 judicial landscape has firmly supported the Department’s authority to link funding to outcomes. In October 2025, a federal district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Department, upholding the GE rule.5 Judge Reed O’Connor, in his ruling, noted that although the rule uses complex mathematical equations, it is fundamentally consistent with the plain meaning of “gainful employment,” which implies that programs must lead to “profitable jobs, instead of loan deficits”.17
The court further dismissed arguments that the rule was “arbitrary and capricious,” validating the Department’s use of IRS earnings data and its chosen debt thresholds.5 This ruling represents a critical milestone for transparency; it confirms that the “value” of a program is no longer a matter of institutional marketing but a matter of federal record.18 For LBA, this legal victory for the Department of Education is a victory for institutional integrity. It ensures that the market is no longer distorted by programs that rely on federal subsidies while producing graduates who cannot afford to repay their loans.6
Operational Efficiency: The Non-Title IV Advantage
Louisville Beauty Academy’s most distinctive feature is its strategic decision to operate as a non-Title IV institution.19 While many beauty schools pursue national accreditation primarily to access federal student loans and Pell Grants, LBA has recognized that this access comes with a significant “compliance tax” that is ultimately borne by the student.20 Research indicates that the administrative overhead required to manage federal aid—including accreditation fees, specialized compliance staff, financial aid software, and mandatory audits—can add 40% to 60% to a school’s tuition rates.20
By eschewing federal subsidies, LBA is able to strip away this unnecessary bureaucracy.20 This lean operational model allows the Academy to offer a 1,500-hour cosmetology licensure pathway for a net cost of approximately $6,250.50, inclusive of all books and supplies.19 In contrast, the average tuition at Title IV-participating beauty schools is approximately $15,000, with many private franchises exceeding $25,000.7 LBA’s model demonstrates that affordability is a function of operational choice, not just institutional mission.
The True Cost of Education: LBA vs. Title IV Models
| Cost Component | Typical Title IV Beauty School | Louisville Beauty Academy (LBA) |
| Standard Tuition | $20,000 – $25,000 20 | $6,250 (Net with Scholarships) 19 |
| Federal Loan Interest | $9,000+ (over 10 years at 6.5%) 23 | $0 (No Loans) 21 |
| Compliance Overhead | High (Audit & software fees) 20 | Minimal (State-level compliance) 20 |
| Monthly Debt Payment | ~$284 23 | $0 23 |
| Total Financial Outlay | ~$34,080 23 | ~$6,700 23 |
The financial impact of this disparity is profound. An LBA student graduates with zero educational debt, meaning 100% of their future professional income is retained for their own economic development.19 A student at a traditional school, conversely, begins their career with a monthly financial burden that acts as “negative compound interest” on their financial life.19 LBA’s debt-free model is not just a marketing claim; it is a structural reality made possible by the Academy’s rejection of the debt-dependent education paradigm.19
Aligning with the Intent of Federal Oversight
The core intent of the Gainful Employment rule is to ensure that vocational programs function as “certainty engines” for workforce stability.19 The Department of Education seeks to phase out programs where students “waste time and money on career programs that provide little value”.17 LBA aligns with this intent by maximizing every efficiency available in the licensure process.
For instance, the Academy offers accelerated, standalone tracks for specific licensures, such as Nail Technology (450 hours) or Esthetics (750 hours), rather than funneling all students into the 1,500-hour cosmetology course.25 This targeted approach allows students to enter the workforce faster, reducing the “risk window” where financial or personal disruptions might cause a student to drop out.24 At LBA, completion is not just a metric; it is the inevitable result of a program designed for the student’s schedule and career goals.26
Comparative Completion and Placement Outcomes (2025 Data)
| Performance Metric | National Industry Average | Louisville Beauty Academy |
| On-Time Graduation Rate | 24% – 31% 26 | ~90% 26 |
| Eventual Completion Rate | < 66% 26 | > 95% 20 |
| State Licensure Pass Rate | Varies by state 20 | Consistently High 20 |
| Job Placement Rate | ~70% 26 | ~90% – 100% 20 |
LBA’s on-time graduation rate of approximately 90% is nearly triple the industry average for Title IV-dependent schools.19 This discrepancy points to a systemic failure in the traditional model, where long programs and high costs often discourage completion. LBA’s high success rate is a direct consequence of its “student-first” model, which incorporates flexible scheduling and multilingual support to accommodate non-traditional learners.24
Economic Impact and the Earnings Premium in Kentucky
The Earnings Premium (EP) test requires that graduates out-earn high school graduates in their state. In Kentucky, this threshold is approximately $30,986 for the target demographic.29 LBA’s internal tracking shows that its graduates typically secure employment in the beauty field or start their own businesses immediately following licensure, with annual earnings frequently reaching the $30,000 to $50,000 range.26
Importantly, because LBA graduates carry no debt, their “effective” income is significantly higher than that of their peers at other schools. A graduate from a traditional school earning $35,000 may lose $3,400 per year to loan payments, while an LBA graduate on the same salary retains the full amount.23 This retained income allows LBA alumni to invest in high-quality equipment, lease salon suites, or open their own storefronts sooner, creating a multiplier effect in the local economy.20 The Academy’s graduates collectively contribute an estimated $20 million to $50 million annually to the Kentucky economy.19
Kentucky Economic Benchmarks (2025)
| Category | Annual Median Earnings | LBA Alignment |
| HS Graduate (KY, Age 25-34) | $30,986 29 | Base threshold for EP Test.2 |
| LBA Graduate (Entry-Level) | $30,000 – $50,000 30 | Exceeds EP threshold significantly.30 |
| Living Wage (Single Adult, KY) | ~$45,000 32 | Targeted outcome for LBA graduates.30 |
| 5-Year Net Retention Advantage | +$27,000 23 | Net benefit of LBA debt-free model.23 |
This data suggests that LBA does not just meet the minimum requirements of the GE rule; it serves as a driver of economic mobility. By focusing on licensure and job readiness, the Academy provides students with a rapid path to a “middle-class” career, fulfilling the exact promise of the Gainful Employment mandate.26
The Impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) on Accountability
The landscape of federal aid is further evolving with the implementation of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), signed into law in July 2025.15 The OBBBA introduces a “Do No Harm” accountability framework that mirrors the GE rule’s earnings test but applies it more broadly to degree programs.15 However, the OBBBA also initiates a significant restructuring of federal lending and repayment, including the elimination of the SAVE repayment plan and the introduction of the Repayment Assistance Plan (RAP).36
Analysis of the RAP indicates it will be more expensive for many borrowers, as it does not include the same income-protection baseline as previous income-driven plans.36 Minimum payments will increase, and the time to forgiveness will be extended for many.36 This shift in federal policy increases the risk associated with taking out student loans for vocational training. In this context, LBA’s model becomes even more valuable. As federal aid becomes more complex and potentially more burdensome, the simplicity and certainty of LBA’s debt-free approach provide a safe harbor for students.22
Furthermore, the OBBBA expands Pell Grants to “very-short-term” job-training programs, provided they are accredited and meet outcome standards.38 While LBA currently operates without federal aid, its emphasis on outcomes-based metrics positions it perfectly for a future where federal support might be tied directly to graduation and licensure pass rates—a policy LBA’s leadership actively champions.33
Serving Diverse Populations and the “Humanization” of Education
A critical component of LBA’s success is its focus on populations often marginalized by the traditional higher education system, including immigrants, refugees, and non-native English speakers.25 Di Tran, the Academy’s founder, emphasizes a “humanized” approach to vocational training, which includes cultural sensitivity and a rejection of exploitative practices common in the industry.26
For instance, many traditional beauty schools rely on “student clinics” where students perform services for the public to generate revenue for the school, often at the expense of focused instruction.7 LBA instead utilizes community service and volunteer practice, ensuring that hands-on training is focused on student learning rather than institutional profit.26 This “Student-First” philosophy is the bedrock of LBA’s high completion rates; students stay because they feel valued and supported.24
The Academy’s commitment to diversity is not just social; it is economic. By moving underserved populations into licensed professional roles, LBA creates immediate taxpaying activity and reduces dependency on public assistance.24 This aligns with broader public policy goals of self-reliance and workforce integration.24
Transparency as a Best Practice: Beyond Compliance
The Gainful Employment rule is ultimately about transparency—giving students the data they need to judge the value of their education.2 LBA has historically exceeded these transparency requirements by providing clear, standardized contracts and upfront pricing that includes all necessary kits and supplies.19 The Academy’s “Golden Standard” model emphasizes clarity before confusion.27
Starting in 2026, LBA is expanding its research and public education initiatives to include structured resources on tax literacy, workforce policy, and professional ethics.27 This initiative seeks to elevate the entire beauty profession by reducing misinformation and compliance risk for all practitioners.27 By sharing its data and outcomes publicly, LBA is not just complying with the spirit of the FVT/GE rule; it is leading the industry toward a more transparent and ethical future.27
Why LBA Represents the Future of Higher Education
The enforcement of the Gainful Employment rule is a necessary step toward repairing the “broken mirror” of vocational education.6 For too long, the industry has been characterized by high debt and low completion rates, sustained by a continuous flow of federal student aid.6 LBA has proven that a different model is possible—one that delivers better results at a fraction of the cost.21
The Academy’s model should be seen as a blueprint for reform because it addresses the root causes of the “debt crisis” in higher education: administrative bloat, excessive program lengths, and a lack of accountability for student outcomes.6 LBA’s success suggests that when schools are forced to rely on their results rather than their ability to process federal paperwork, students win.
Summary of Alignment: LBA vs. Gainful Employment Intent
| GE Intent / Public Policy Goal | Louisville Beauty Academy (LBA) Action |
| Ensure programs lead to profitable jobs.17 | 90% placement; $30k–$50k starting wages.26 |
| Protect students from unmanageable debt.8 | Structural rejection of debt; zero-loan model.19 |
| Verify that education provides an earnings lift.2 | Graduates consistently out-earn HS graduates.30 |
| Increase transparency for families.1 | Transparent, all-inclusive net pricing.19 |
| Efficient use of taxpayer dollars.8 | Non-Title IV; zero reliance on federal subsidies.19 |
Conclusion: A Vision of Integrity and Success
The enforcement of the U.S. Gainful Employment rule does not threaten the students of Louisville Beauty Academy because LBA has never relied on the practices that the rule seeks to eliminate. The Academy does not inflate tuition to capture federal grants, it does not extend program hours to maximize loan eligibility, and it does not graduate students into a cycle of debt. Instead, LBA has built a model based on the very outcomes that federal regulators are now demanding from the rest of the industry.
For students and families, the GE rule provides a new level of protection and clarity, helping them identify institutions that prioritize their future over their financial aid eligibility. For regulators, LBA serves as a living laboratory for outcomes-based education, demonstrating that high standards and affordability are not mutually exclusive. As the American higher education system moves toward a more accountable and transparent future, the Louisville Beauty Academy model stands as a testament to the fact that when you focus on the success of the student, compliance is not a hurdle—it is a hallmark of excellence. LBA remains committed to being a leader in this new era, proving every day that beauty education can be a powerful engine for economic and personal transformation, free from the burden of debt.
Works cited
- Financial Value Transparency and Gainful Employment Information | Knowledge Center, accessed February 10, 2026, https://fsapartners.ed.gov/knowledge-center/topics/financial-value-transparency-and-gainful-employment-information
- Gainful Employment Take One: Motivation, History, and the Reality of the New Rules, accessed February 10, 2026, https://www.richmondfed.org/region_communities/regional_data_analysis/community_college_survey/community_college_insights/2024/gainful_employment_20240322
- Gainful Employment – Federal Student Aid, accessed February 10, 2026, https://studentaid.gov/data-center/school/ge
- Gainful Employment Web Center – nasfaa, accessed February 10, 2026, https://www.nasfaa.org/Gainful_Employment
- Higher Education Litigation Summary: October 28, 2025 | Thompson Coburn LLP, accessed February 10, 2026, https://www.thompsoncoburn.com/insights/higher-education-litigation-summary-october-28-2025/
- Federal Aid, Licensure, and the Debt Crisis in Cosmetology Education – RESEARCH 2025, accessed February 10, 2026, https://naba4u.org/2025/12/federal-aid-licensure-and-the-debt-crisis-in-cosmetology-education-research-2025/
- Cut Short: The Broken Promises of Cosmetology Education – ERIC, accessed February 10, 2026, https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED676659.pdf
- Gainful Employment and Transparency Fact Sheet (PDF), accessed February 10, 2026, https://www.ed.gov/sites/ed/files/policy/highered/reg/hearulemaking/2021/gainful-employment-and-transparency-fact-sheet.pdf
- “This is a Silver Standard:” A Case Study of New Jersey’s Legislation to Ensure Career Preparation Programs Pay Off, accessed February 10, 2026, https://ticas.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/NJ-Career-Program-Case-Study-October-2024.pdf
- New Gainful Employment Rules Impact For-Profit and Nonprofit Colleges and Universities, accessed February 10, 2026, https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2023/10/new-gainful-employment-rules-impact-for-profit-and-nonprofit
- Reminder of FVT GE Required Reporting for the 2025 Cycle | Knowledge Center, accessed February 10, 2026, https://fsapartners.ed.gov/knowledge-center/library/electronic-announcements/2025-07-09/reminder-fvt-ge-required-reporting-2025-cycle
- Judge Rules in Favor of Biden Gainful Employment Rule, accessed February 10, 2026, https://career.org/web/web/Multimedia/Blog/Judge-Rules-in-Favor-of-Biden-Gainful-Employment-Rule.aspx
- Understanding Gainful Employment Reporting Requirements – McClintock & Associates, accessed February 10, 2026, https://mcclintockcpa.com/understanding-gainful-employment-reporting-requirements/
- New Guidance, Gainful Employment – JD Supra, accessed February 10, 2026, https://www.jdsupra.com/topics/new-guidance/gainful-employment/
- Americans Are United on Accountability – New America, accessed February 10, 2026, https://www.newamerica.org/education-policy/edcentral/americans-are-united-on-accountability/
- Higher Ed Rulemaking To-Do List: Make All Programs Pass Minimum Earnings Test and Maintain Financial Value Transparency Framework – IHEP, accessed February 10, 2026, https://www.ihep.org/higher-ed-rulemaking-to-do-list-make-all-programs-pass-minimum-earnings-test-and-maintain-financial-value-transparency-framework/
- Federal judge dismisses legal challenge to gainful employment rule …, accessed February 10, 2026, https://www.highereddive.com/news/federal-judge-dismisses-legal-challenge-gainful-employment-rule/801972/
- The Department’s Victory on Gainful Employment and What It Means for Higher Ed, accessed February 10, 2026, https://onedtech.philhillaa.com/p/the-departments-victory-on-gainful-employment-and-what-it-means-for-higher-ed
- A Comprehensive Strategic Analysis of Louisville Beauty Academy …, accessed February 10, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/a-comprehensive-strategic-analysis-of-louisville-beauty-academy-a-national-model-for-high-roi-compliance-driven-and-humanized-vocational-education-research-policy-library-feb-2026/
- highest graduation rate beauty school Archives – Louisville Beauty Academy, accessed February 10, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/tag/highest-graduation-rate-beauty-school/
- Rising Student Debt and Defaults in Beauty Schools: A Crisis and a Solution – RESARCH MAY 2025 – Viet Bao Louisville KY, accessed February 10, 2026, https://vietbaolouisville.com/2025/05/rising-student-debt-and-defaults-in-beauty-schools-a-crisis-and-a-solution-resarch-may-2025/
- Financial Aid Options and Payment Model at Louisville Beauty Academy, accessed February 10, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/financial-aid-options-and-definition/
- beauty school breakeven analysis Archives – Louisville Beauty Academy – Louisville KY, accessed February 10, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/tag/beauty-school-breakeven-analysis/
- Louisville Beauty Academy, Di Tran, and Di Tran University as a “Certainty Engine” for Workforce Stability in an Era of Volatility, accessed February 10, 2026, https://naba4u.org/2025/12/louisville-beauty-academy-di-tran-and-di-tran-university-as-a-certainty-engine-for-workforce-stability-in-an-era-of-volatility/
- Louisville Beauty Academy’s Model vs. Typical U.S. Beauty Schools: A Comprehensive Comparison, accessed February 10, 2026, https://naba4u.org/2025/06/louisville-beauty-academys-model-vs-typical-u-s-beauty-schools-a-comprehensive-comparison/
- Outcomes-Based Beauty Education : A Workforce and Policy …, accessed February 10, 2026, https://naba4u.org/2025/12/outcomes-based-beauty-education-a-workforce-and-policy-analysis-of-debt-free-completion-driven-vocational-models-research-december-2025/
- Louisville Beauty Academy: Our Direction Forward (2026 and Beyond), accessed February 10, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/louisville-beauty-academy-our-direction-forward-2026-and-beyond/
- Comparative Analysis of Beauty Schools: Louisville Beauty Academy vs. National Institutes – RESEARCH JULY 2025 – Di Tran University, accessed February 10, 2026, https://ditranuniversity.com/comparative-analysis-of-beauty-schools-louisville-beauty-academy-vs-national-institutes-research-july-2025/
- How Much More High School Graduates Earn Than Non-Graduates in Every State | U.S. Career Institute, accessed February 10, 2026, https://www.uscareerinstitute.edu/blog/how-much-more-high-school-graduates-earn-than-non-graduates
- Big Beautiful Bill Archives – Louisville Beauty Academy, accessed February 10, 2026, https://louisvillebeautyacademy.net/tag/big-beautiful-bill/
- DI TRAN – Executive Summary – New American Business Association (NABA) – Louisville, KY, accessed February 10, 2026, https://naba4u.org/di-tran-executive-summary/
- Tracking the Class of 2023’s First Year Outcomes – KentuckianaWorks, accessed February 10, 2026, https://www.kentuckianaworks.org/news/hsgrads2023
- Di Tran Brings Kentucky’s Voice to Washington: Louisville Beauty Academy Founder Named NSBA 2025 Advocate Finalist, accessed February 10, 2026, https://vietbaolouisville.com/2025/09/di-tran-brings-kentuckys-voice-to-washington-louisville-beauty-academy-founder-named-nsba-2025-advocate-finalist/
- One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) – USC Financial Aid, accessed February 10, 2026, https://financialaid.usc.edu/obbba/
- How Do College Programs Measure Up Against the One Big Beautiful Bill Act’s New Accountability Standard? – American University, accessed February 10, 2026, https://www.american.edu/spa/peer/upload/obbba-accountability_rpt_final.pdf
- Raising the Cost of Borrowing, Reducing Access: How the One Big Beautiful Bill Reshapes Financial Aid and Repayment – The Education Trust, accessed February 10, 2026, https://edtrust.org/rti/raising-the-cost-of-borrowing-reducing-access-how-the-one-big-beautiful-bill-reshapes-financial-aid-and-repayment/
- Key Changes to Federal Student Loans Made in the Recent One Big Beautiful Bill Act, accessed February 10, 2026, https://sfs.harvard.edu/2025-changes-federal-student-loans
- One Big Beautiful Bill: Key Implications for Higher Education and Nonprofit Institutions, accessed February 10, 2026, https://www.cullenllp.com/blog/one-big-beautiful-bill-key-implications-for-higher-education-and-nonprofit-institutions/
- E-Update for December 8, 2025 – EducationCounsel, accessed February 10, 2026, https://educationcounsel.com/our_work/e-updates/all/e-update-for-december-8-2025
- NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES COSMETOLOGY GETS A TRIM: THE IMPACT OF REDUCING LICENSING HOURS ON COLLEGES AND STUDENTS Nicolas Aceve, accessed February 10, 2026, https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w33936/w33936.pdf
